MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7001109753

Innovative Approaches for Real-Time Toxicity Detection in Social Media Using Deep Reinforcement Learning

2024· other· en· W7001109753 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConcordia UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsCanada Research ChairsMcGill University
KeywordsReinforcement learningSocial mediaClassifier (UML)Focus (optics)Leverage (statistics)False positive paradoxRevenue
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Toxic comments on social media discourage user engagement and have serious consequences for mental health and social well-being. Such negativity heightens feelings of anxiety, depression, and social isolation among users, ultimately diminishing their experience on these platforms. For businesses, these toxic interactions are detrimental as they lead to reduced user engagement, subsequently affecting advertising revenue and market share. Creating a safe and inclusive online environment is essential for business success and social responsibility. This requires real-time detection of toxic behavior through automated methods. However, many existing toxicity detectors focus mainly on accuracy, often neglecting important factors including throughput, computational costs, and the impact of false positives and negatives on user engagement. Additionally, these methods are evaluated in controlled experimental settings (offline tests), which do not reflect the complexities of large-scale social media environments. This limitation hinders their practical applicability in real-world scenarios. This thesis addresses these limitations by introducing a Profit-driven Simulation (PDS) framework for evaluating the real-time performance of deep learning classifiers in complex social media settings. The PDS framework integrates performance, computational efficiency, and user engagement, revealing that optimal classifier selection depends on the toxicity level of the environment. High-throughput classifiers are most effective in low- and high-toxicity scenarios, while classifiers offering moderate accuracy and throughput excel in medium-toxicity contexts. Additionally, the thesis tackles the challenge of imbalanced datasets by introducing a novel method for augmenting toxic text data. By applying Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), this method fine-tunes Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate diverse, semantically consistent toxic data. This approach enhances classifier robustness, particularly in detecting minority class instances. The thesis also proposes a Proximal Policy Optimization-based Cascaded Inference System (PPO-CIS), which dynamically assigns classifiers based on performance and computational costs. This system improves efficiency by using high-throughput classifiers for initial filtering and more accurate classifiers for final decisions, reducing the workload on human moderators. Extensive evaluations on datasets such as Kaggle-Jigsaw and ToxiGen demonstrate significant improvements in processing time, detection accuracy, and overall user satisfaction, contributing to the development of scalable, cost-effective toxicity detection systems for social media platforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)→French-language works237,207→