MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7001144356

The Impact of COVID-19 on Canadian Acute Care Nursing Professionals: An Integrative Review

2023· dissertation· en· W7001144356 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicAcute careInclusion (mineral)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Health careMental healthMEDLINEHealthcare system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has put widespread pressures on the Canadian healthcare system. As infections soared and the healthcare system attempted to grapple with increased patient loads and acuity, nurses were impacted and, among other issues, began leaving the profession. Shortfalls of acute care staff have caused bed closures, service disruptions, and decreased access to timely patient care. In order to stem the tide of nurses exiting the profession, the system needs to change. Understanding the complexity of pandemic impacts on nurses is integral to making changes that will be most impactful as COVID-19 continues and as new pandemics occur. Purpose: To integrate the current evidence of COVID-19 impacts on Canadian acute care nurses. Method: This is an integrative review using Whittemore and Knafl’s framework. The databases searched were CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and NIH. The search terms used were Canada/Canadian/Canadians, the name of each province, nurse/nurses/nursing, and COVID 19/SARS-CoV-2/coronavirus/cov-19. Search criteria were supported by a health sciences librarian. Twenty articles were found to meet inclusion criteria and contribute to an understanding of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute care nurses specifically. Results: The current evidence has been synthesized into a conceptual framework which indicates the COVID-19 pandemic impacted acute care nurses in Canada through four main mechanisms: a) changes which sometimes occurred rapidly and frequently; b) access to needed resources; c) connections between nurses as well as others; and d) aspects of the infectious agent itself. The outcomes of the pandemic on nurses included positive effects, physical effects, emotional responses, leaving/attrition, and mental health disorders. As well, four significant mediating factors were identified as coping, making connections, learning and experience, and finding meaning. Application to Nursing: Nurses have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in ways that are far-reaching and possibly long-term. Understanding how these impacts occur, can help in the formation of policies and procedures that can mitigate the effects and support nurses even during pandemic events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score0.687

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0220.027
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)→Same topicCOVID-19 and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→