Journal of Women in Educational Leadership, Vol. 1, No. 4-October 2003
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a great resource in Women's World: A Timeline of Women in History (1995) by Franck and Brownstone.The book is a chronology of women in history from 35,000 B.c. to 1993.Entries highlight women's accomplishments and "firsts" in politics/law/war, religion!education!everyday life, science/technology/medicine, and arts/literature.The 654 pages of text suggest that we have much to learn about these women pioneers.A review of the 20 th century entries alone reminds us that Margaret Mead, in 1949, published Male and Female, a study of the social and biological factors that determine gender roles.In 1951, Barbara McClintock first publicly presented her discovery that genetic fragments are transposable, which she recognized as early as the 1930s, long before the structure of DNA was understood.Her report was so ill-received that for decades she would work without publishing.She received a 1983 Nobel Prize for medicine for her work.A somewhat familiar note of irony is evident in the 1967 entry for British astronomer Jocelyn Bell, then a graduate student at Cambridge University, who discovered pulsating astronomical objects dubbed pulsars: her professor, Antony Hewish, received the 1974 Nobel Prize for physics for the discovery; Bell did not (p.492).In 1973 the American Psychological Association established a division focusing on the psychology of women, with its own scholarly journal, Psychology of Women Quarterly.In 1975~ Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, an American women's studies scholarly journal, was first published.The Journal of Women in Educational Leadership is an early mark in the 21 st century timeline and lengthens the chronological chart of women in history.In this issue, Mertz' longitudinal study of scholarship about women is extended, and Byrd-Blake offers perceptions of African American, Hispanic and white females concerning the strategies that enhance career advancement.Rhodes provides profiles of two women community college presidents and the lessons these women offer others considering the role.White, Martin & Johnson examine gender, professional orientation, and student achievement in their study of 100 school principals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.063 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".