L’éducation artistique dans les écoles francophones et d’immersion française au Manitoba : le vécu des enseignants généralistes (de la maternelle à la 6e année)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude qualitative examine l’expérience vécue de cinq enseignantes généralistes de la maternelle à la 6e année des programmes français et d’immersion française au Manitoba à l’égard de l’éducation artistique. Dans le contexte minoritaire francophone, les arts et la culture sont indispensables à l’épanouissement des communautés francophones, conséquemment, l’éducation artistique doit avoir une place de choix dans le milieu scolaire. Parallèlement aux spécialistes des arts, les enseignants généralistes sont appelés à jouer un rôle dans la mise en œuvre de l’éducation artistique. Cette étude phénoménologique de cas multiples inspirée par une approche axée sur les arts donne une voix à cinq enseignantes généralistes et permet d’explorer et de comprendre leur expérience, leurs perceptions et leurs croyances, ainsi qu’à clarifier leur rôle et leurs besoins d’apprentissage professionnel dans ce domaine. Des recommandations pour l’administration scolaire, le ministère de l’Éducation, les facultés d’éducation des universités et les organismes artistiques ont émergé à partir des réflexions des participantes et de l’analyse des données de cette étude axée sur le Programme français et le Programme d’immersion française au Manitoba. This qualitative study examines the lived experience of five Kindergarten to Grade 6 generalist teachers in Manitoba's Français and French immersion programs in relation to arts education. Arts and culture are essential to the flourishing of minority Francophone communities, and consequently, arts education must be prominent in the school environment. Alongside arts specialists, generalist teachers are called upon to play a role in providing arts education. This phenomenological multiple case study, inspired by arts-based methodology, gives a voice to five generalist teachers, and allows for exploration and understanding of their experiences, perceptions, and beliefs, along with the clarification of their teaching role and professional needs. Recommendations for school administrators, the Department of Education, University Faculties of Education, and arts organizations emerged from the participants' perspectives and the data analysis from this study that focused on the Français and French Immersion programs in Manitoba.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".