Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le 4 Novembre, 2008, Barack Obama, de père noir et de mère blanche, accède à la magistrature suprême des États-Unis d'Amérique devant le monde entier stupéfait et fasciné par l'importance de cet événement qui se répète le 6 novembre 2012, faisant pour la deuxième fois ce fils de Kenyan et d'Africain le président de la nation la plus puissante du monde. Il semble alors essentiel de revenir, non pas sur le discours du révérend Martin Luther King, mais sur l'impact social, discursif et médiatique de son assassinat, le 4 Avril 1968. Sur la base du radiodiffuseur public du Canada, Radio-Canada, nous espérons découvrir les types d'interactions de communication, les questions discursives, ce qui est dit et ce qui est montré sur les Noirs dans ces moments particuliers. Nous présentons d'abord la structure et les problèmes du programme, avant d'étudier plus en profondeur les différentes positions et les méthodes d'observation qui conduisent à une réception synthétique de la catégorie de constitution.On November 4, 2008, Barack Obama, a half - breed fellow from a Black father and a White mother, accesses the highest office of the United States of America, before the world which remained stunned and fascinated by such a huge complexity of America which repeated itself on November 6, 2012 making for the second time that son of a Kenyan and African man the Head of the most powerful Nation in the world. Then it seems essential to go back, not to the speech of Reverend Martin Luther King, but to the social, discursive and media impact of his assassination, on April 4, 1968. Based on the report of the Canadian public broadcaster, Radio Canada, we hope to discover the types of communicative interactions and discursive issues and the said and shown categorical Black in these particular times, first through a presentation of the structure and problems of the program, before studying more deeply the different positions, and methods of observation that lead to a synthetic reception of the constituted category.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".