"La répression, ça finit par donner des résultats" : \nThe displacement and erasure of street culture in downtown Montréal 1995-2010
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Between 1995 and 2010, drug users, sex workers and street involved people in downtown Montréal faced a period of significant structural and social change. This period of change was characterized notably by several distinct waves of police repression, significant municipal development and revitalization, as well as the closure and expropriation of a range of commercial and indoor spaces central to the organization and composition of street culture, including hotels, bars, rooming houses and peepshows. These structural shifts downtown resulted in the displacement and dispersal of street involved communities outside of the downtown core, and represented a profound reorganization of the social relations of street culture. This included the loss of informal supportive networks, the disintegration of pre-existing social bonds, and the undermining of certain social practice. \n \nThese structural shifts downtown also resulted in a reorganization of institutional relations between the Direction de santé publique, and streetwork practice in downtown Montréal, creating important implications for HIV and HCV prevention. The loss of contacts caused by the displacement process contributed to the rise of instrumentalism in streetwork practice, growing exigencies around statistical monitoring, and a progressive shift toward prise en charge approaches. These shifts confronted streetworkers both with pragmatic questions about the organization of their labour, as well as ethical questions about their relationship to street milieus, and streetwork practice in the context of a remade urban landscape. \n \nInspired by grounded theory method, this thesis employs semi-structured qualitative interviews with streetworkers employed between 1995 and 2010. This analysis describes how the displacement of street culture and the transformation of street-level social relations was achieved, and how this process was driven by specific institutional and social policy. It provides an assessment of the impacts and implications of displacement and social transformation on street involved communities, and on street level social relations. In the process, this analysis raises epistemological questions about how cultural erasure is achieved. It asks how specific notions of street culture as essentially disorganized enable certain kinds of interventions, and ultimately enable displacement. It also raises the question regarding the importance of daily social relations and social bonds of street culture in HIV and HCV prevention, as well as the role of community organizations and streetwork practice in the face of displacement and structural change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".