Konferencija Constructing Policy Work in a Changing Governmental Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Constructing Policy Work in a Changing Governmental Environment U Dubrovniku je od 13. do 15.lipnja 2008.održana konferencija Is traživačkog odbora za javnu politiku i javnu upravu Međunarodnog društva za političke znanosti (Research Committee On Public Policy And Administration, International Political Science Association -IPSA) pod nazi vom Oblikovanje javnih politika u promjenjivom političko-upravnom okružju.Konferenciju su suorganizirali Hrvatsko politološko društvo (HPD), Sveučilište u Dubrovniku te Fakultet političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zag rebu.Prvenstveno je bila namijenjena doktorskim kandidatima i studenti ma koji su dobili priliku predstaviti svoje radove te dobiti korisne savjete i kritike.Konferencija se u potpunosti odvijala na engleskom jeziku.Tematika konferencije obuhvatila je raznovrsna pitanja i probleme obliko vanja javnih politika vezane uz kompleksnost i promjenjivost društvenog, političkog i ekonomskog okružja te posebno uz međunarodne organizaci je kao što je Europska unija.U tom smislu doktrina dobre vladavine (good governance) koju međunarodne organizacije propagiraju u tranzicijskim zemljama normativistički naznačuje »ispravan« tijek policy procesa.Konferencija je bila podijeljena u osam modula, svaki sa dvije do četiri prezentacije sa srodnom tematikom te obveznom raspravom -nakon iz laganja diskutant bi iznio svoja zapažanja o prikazanom tekstu, definirao probleme, postavio pitanja te dao određene sugestije, a zatim su i ostali sudionici konferencije bili pozvani dati svoje komentare, zapažanja i pre poruke.U vrlo opuštenoj i konstruktivnoj atmosferi dijalog između izlagatelja, diskutanta i ostalih sudionika u mnogim je slučajevima doveo do zanimljivih i za istraživače iznimno korisnih zaključaka.Nakon uvodnog obraćanja i izlaganja profesora Hala Colebatcha te Jorgea Heinea, uslijedio je rad po modulima.S obzirom na velik broj izlaga-HRVATSKA JAVNA UPRAVA
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.028 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.043 | 0.019 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".