MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001675310

Las teorías de la diversidad cultural de Will Kymlicka y Gerd Baumann. Un análisis comparativo de su recepción en España (1995-2010)

2014· dissertation· es· W7001675310 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigitum: Institutional Repository of the University of Murcia (University of Murcia) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNationalism and Cultural Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)PublicsAmbivalenceDemocracyContemporary history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Palabras Clave: Diversidad cultural, etnicidad, nacionalismo, migración, multiculturalismo, Cataluña, España, Quebec, Canadá, Historia de la Antropología, Sociología de la Filosofía, Estudios comparativos, Teoría Política, Redes intelectuales, Importación intelectual, Comunidades epistémicas\n\nRESUMEN DE LA TESIS\n\nEn esta tesis doctoral se realiza un análisis comparativo de las recepciones intelectuales de las teorías de la diversidad cultural de Will Kymlicka (filósofo y politólogo) y Gerd Baumann (antropólogo sociocultural) en España. Ambas recepciones comenzaron a tener lugar a mediados de los noventa, en un contexto socio-político caracterizado por el aumento de la inmigración y la permanencia de los nacionalismos minoritarios, y en un contexto intelectual caracterizado por las consolidaciones tanto de la transición filosófica como de la institucionalización antropológica en España. \nA través de un enfoque teórico-metodológico que combina las herramientas de la historia intelectual y la sociología del conocimiento científico y filosófico, partimos de la hipótesis ‒formulada por P. Bourdieu‒ de que en la circulación internacional de ideas, las teorías importadas son sometidas a una reconfiguración local en los campos de recepción que responde a intereses específicos. Dentro de este marco, se pretende responder a los siguientes interrogantes:\n¿Cómo, cuándo y por qué fueron importadas las teorías a España?\n¿De qué manera han sido incorporadas y reconfiguradas en los campos intelectuales de recepción?\n¿Con qué fenómenos políticos, sociales e intelectuales se pueden vincular ambas recepciones?\n¿Existen patrones identificables en ambos procesos?\nCon respecto a su relación con los fenómenos intelectuales, en la tesis se muestran, por ejemplo, las conexiones entre ambos procesos de importación intelectual, y la modernización e institucionalización de la antropología y la filosofía. Al tiempo, se identifican los vínculos entre ambos procesos y la situación socio-política española contemporánea. Principalmente, se establecen vínculos entre ambos procesos y la problemática del nacionalismo catalán. Por decirlo de forma muy esquemática, Kymlicka proveerá de una teoría normativa con la que legitimar el discurso y las reivindicaciones del nacionalismo catalán, y sus teorías serán utilizadas a tal fin por algunos de sus importadores. Baumann, por su parte, desarrollará una nueva hipótesis para el análisis de las relaciones interétnicas, surgida como consecuencia de su intento por explicar los procesos de construcción de identidades y diferencias por parte del nacionalismo catalán. Por lo tanto, por un lado, la tesis contribuye a reconstruir una importante pieza de la historia actual de los campos de la filosofía y la antropología sociocultural española. Por otro lado, el análisis va más allá, mostrando los vínculos entre los ámbitos académico, político y social. Finalmente, la tesis trata de mostrar la existencia de patrones de importación y rearticulación intelectual, basándose en las evidencias empíricas de dos estudios de caso concretos.\n\nWILL KYMLICKA’S AND GERD BAUMANN’S THEORIES OF CULTURAL DIVERSITY. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THEIR RECEPTION IN SPAIN\nKeywords: Cultural diversity, ethnicity, nationalism, migration, multiculturalism, Catalonia, Spain, Quebec, Canada, History of Anthropology, Sociology of Philosophy, Comparative Studies, Political Theory, Intellectual Networks, Intellectual importation, Epistemic communities.\n\nSUMMARY\n\nThis thesis undertakes a comparative analysis of the reception of Will Kymlicka’s and Gerd Baumann’s theories of cultural diversity in Spain. Both receptions started to take place in the mid 1990s, in a socio-political context characterised by the rise of immigration to Spain and the durability of minority nationalism. The intellectual context was characterised by the consolidations of both the philosophical transition and the institutionalisation of Sociocultural Anthropology in Spain.\nThrough an analytical approach that combines tools from the Intellectual History and the Sociology of Philosophical and Scientific Knowledge, we depart ‒following P. Bourdieu‒ from the assumption that in the international circulation of ideas, imported theories are subject to local reconfigurations in the fields of reception. Within this framework, the thesis aims to address these questions:\nHow and when and why were these theories imported to Spain?\nHow did these theories become incorporated and reconfigured into the local contexts?\nWhich social, political and intellectual phenomena can we relate these processes with?\nAre there any identifiable patterns in these two processes?\nThe answers to these questions show for instance, the links between both processes of intellectual importation and the modernisation and institutionalisation of Philosophy and Anthropology in Spain. At the same time, the thesis identifies the connections between both processes and the socio-political situation in contemporary Spain. Links are mainly established between both processes and the question of Catalan nationalism. Summarising, while Kymlicka has provided a theoretical framework for the legitimisation of Catalan nationalist claims within the normative coordinates of ‘Liberal Nationalism’, Gerd Baumann has developed a theoretical framework for analysing identity/difference construction as a response to his own confrontation to the ‘Catalan grammars of Identity/Alterity’.\nTherefore, on the one hand, this thesis contributes to the reconstruction of an important dimension of the current history of the fields of Philosophy and Anthropology in Spain. On the other hand, the analysis goes beyond, showing the connections and relations between the social, political and academic spheres. Finally, the thesis shows the existence of patterns of intellectual importation and reconfiguration, based on the empirical evidences collected in two case studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigitum: Institutional Repository of the University of Murcia (University of Murcia)Same topicNationalism and Cultural IdentityFrench-language works237,207