MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001709608

La secesión de territorios en la Constitución española = The secession of territories in the Spanish Constitution

2013· article· es· W7001709608 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEspacio Tiempo y Forma Serie I Prehistoria y Arqueología · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Systems and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstitutionDemocracySecessionDemocratic systemDeductive method
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabajo analiza la secesión de territorios en la Constitución española. En\nprimer lugar, hay que constatar que el texto constitucional afirma la «indisoluble unidad»\nde España, lo que excluye la posibilidad de secesión de territorios sin previa reforma de\nla Constitución. La exigencia de reforma, sin embargo, no viene motivada por la singular\nrefacción del artículo 2 de la Constitución, sino que es consustancial a los sistemas democráticos,\naunque no incluyan, de forma expresa, la indisolubilidad del Estado. Pero, el análisis\nconstitucional de la secesión, ¿debe concluir con esta constatación? En los últimos decenios\nse ha ido construyendo un nuevo paradigma constitucional sobre la forma en que las\nConstituciones democráticas deben abordar las reclamaciones secesionistas, atendiendo a los\nprincipios que subyacen a la Constitución. Esta vía es la que han desbrozado países como\nCanadá, al afrontar la reclamación de independencia de Québec, o Reino Unido, al afrontar\nla reclamación de independencia de Escocia. Este trabajo trata de analizar la forma en que\nestos principios son aplicables en la Constitución española.This paper analyzes the seccesion of territories under the Spanish Constitution.\nFirst, we must note that the Constitution provides the «indisoluble unity» of Spain; that\nmeans that the secession of territories without prior amendment of the Constitution has to be\nexcluded. But the need for constituional Amendment, however, in general rule which applys\nto all democratic Constitutions, even them which doesn’t include expressly the State’s indissolubility.\nBut does that means thatconstitutional analysis of secession should conclude with\nthis statement? In the last decades it has been building a new constitutional paradigm about\nhow democratic constitutional systems muss adress secesionist claims, according to the principles\nunderlying the Constitution. Countries like Canada, regarding claims for sovereignty\nof Québec, and United Kingdom, regarding claims for Independence of Scotland, have gone\ndown this path. This paper attemps to analyze how these principles apply in the Spanish\nconstitutional system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspacio Tiempo y Forma Serie I Prehistoria y ArqueologíaSame topicPolitical Systems and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207