L’ergonomie au Québec : perspectives et prospectives Ergonomics in Québec : perspectives and prospects La ergonomía en Quebec : perspectivas y prospectivas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le texte propose un survol de l’ergonomie au Québec ainsi qu’une réflexion sur les défis à relever. Nous retraçons les étapes clés de son évolution, à travers les faits et les événements qui l’ont jalonnée au cours des 30 dernières années : ses aïeux, la genèse et le hasard des rencontres, l’implantation de l’ergonomie et le rôle des institutions, la consolidation, l’effervescence des années 90, la situation actuelle. Cette histoire est située dans son contexte socio-politique, à la lumière des développements réalisés en santé au travail et de l’évolution des institutions qui s’est échelonnée entre les années 1970 à 2000. La dernière partie propose des pistes de réflexion sur les grands défis qu’a à relever l’ergonomie pour continuer à s’insérer au milieu des transformations actuelles : son positionnement dans les processus décisionnels, son insertion dans le temps, le renouvellement et l’articulation de ses connaissances, son organisation.<br>This paper proposes a brief overview of ergonomics in Québec as well as reflection on its challenges. We trace the key steps in its evolution through the facts and events that marked its development over the last 30 years : its pioneers, origins, unplanned encounters, the establishment of ergonomics and the role of institutions, consolidation, the exhilaration of the ‘90s, and the current situation. This history is situated in its socio-political context in the light of developments in occupational health and the evolution of institutions that occurred between 1970 and 2000. The last part proposes avenues of reflection on the main challenges that ergonomics has to meet in order to continue to be part of the current changes : its position in decision processes, dealing with times issues, the renewal and articulation of its knowledge, and its organization.<br>El texto propone una visión general de la ergonomía en Quebec, así como una reflexión sobre los desafíos a enfrentar. Se reconstituyen las etapas claves de su evolución a través de los hechos y los eventos que han marcado en el curso de los últimos 30 años : sus antepasados, la génesis y los encuentros casuales, la implantación de la ergonomía y el rol de las instituciones, la consolidación, la efervescencia de los años 90, la situación actual. La historia se sitúa en su contexto socio-político, a la luz del desarrollo en salud ocupacional y de la evolución de las instituciones ocurridos entre 1970 y 2000. La última parte propone pistas para la reflexión sobre los grandes desafíos que la ergonomía debe enfrentar para continuar a insertarse en las actuales transformaciones : su posicionamiento en los procesos de decisión, su inserción en el tiempo, la renovación y la articulación de sus conocimientos, su organización
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".