MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7002010744

LEVEL OF SUPPLEMENTAL FAT IN PREGNANT BEEF COW DIETS DURING MID-TO-LATE GESTATION: EFFECTS ON PERFORMANCE OF THE DAM AND PROGENY FROM BIRTH TO WEANING

2024· dissertation· en· W7002010744 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBeef Cattle Research CouncilSaskatchewan Canola Development Commission
KeywordsConceptusGestationWeaningCanolaPregnancyRandomized block designBeef cattleDry matterBody weight
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 2-year study evaluated the effects of feeding a canola-based (7.4% ether extract) pellet to gestating cows on cow performance, reproductive efficiency, milk yield and composition, blood metabolite concentrations, and calf performance until weaning. Each yr, 72 pregnant cows were stratified by stage of gestation (111 ± 20 d) and body weight (BW; 619 ± 50 kg), allocated to 12 pens in a randomized complete block design. Pens were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 replicated (n = 4/yr) dietary treatments: 0 (CON), 150 (LOW), and 300 (HIGH) g of fat/d from canola pellet (DM basis). Diets were formulated to be isonitrogenous (CP: 8.40 ± 0.40%) and isocaloric (TDN: 59.78 ± 1.05%), while meeting NASEM (2016) nutrient requirements for pregnant beef cattle. Treatments were fed during the last two trimesters of gestation (148 ± 3 d) based on a dry matter intake of 1.89% of treatment average BW and transitioned to a common diet at the end of the feeding trial. Orthogonal contrasts were used to assess linear and quadratic relationships between fat inclusion and dependent variables. Differences were detected in body condition score (BCS; 1-5 scale; P = 0.03) and rib fat thickness (P < 0.05) at the start of trial, thus were included as covariates in the analysis of all related variables at subsequent time points. BW and conceptus corrected BW tended to linearly increase (P = 0.10 and 0.07, respectively) and the percentage of thin cows (BCS ≤ 2.5) linearly decreased (P = 0.01) across treatments at calving. As fat inclusion increased, BCS change from calving to breeding and weaning (P < 0.01 and 0.01, respectively) and BCS at breeding (P < 0.01) quadratically decreased. There was a quadratic response (P = 0.03) in pregnancy rate to fat inclusion, maximizing at 150 g/d of added fat. Although fat inclusion tended to linearly decrease (P = 0.10) male birth weight, there were no differences (P ≥ 0.34) in progeny weaning weight or average daily gain from birth to weaning for either sex. Fat supplementation at 150 g/d optimized reproduction without negative impacts on pre-weaning progeny growth and profitability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207