MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7002014458

Mental health diversion from hospital emergency departments : assessing a joint effort of two mental health methods and police partnerships

2019· article· en· W7002014458 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthGeneral partnershipApprehensionMental illnessMental health serviceEmergency departmentService (business)Focus group
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to examine both individual and joint efforts in mental health collaboration and how individual and group initiatives can lead to decreased emergency department (ED) presentations and improved client care. Local and international literature is presented as a way to inform, advise, or hypothesize about known gaps in literature. Method: Secondary data from the 2016 calendar year was accessed through Alberta Health Services (AHS). All Mental Health Act apprehensions that occurred in the City of Edmonton during the 2016 calendar year comprise the secondary data. Data surrounding Mental Health calls for service for both Urgent Services, the Police and Crisis Team, and the Edmonton Police Service was captured and analyzed with a chi-square analysis, with a focus on the call disposition. Results: Research findings indicated the presence of a mental health clinician through either a Knoxville or Separate Response Model influenced person/people with mental illness (PMI) being admitted to hospital post mental health apprehension. PMI brought to an emergency department via a mental health act apprehension without a mental health clinician were more likely to be discharged. An informal partnership (Separate Response Model) was more successful than a formal partnership (Knoxville Model) in diverting PMI away from hospital. Regardless of substance use, there was no difference in disposition between substance and non-substance related mental health apprehensions. Findings from this research indicate mental health and police collaboration improves client care through timely access to appropriate care.\n\t\tKeywords: schizophrenia, first-responder, psychiatric nurse, mental health, mental illness, addictions, bizarre behavior, suicidal, police, collaboration, Crisis Intervention Team, Knoxville Model, Birmingham Model, crisis negotiation, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.045
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.045
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0020.014
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)Same topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207