MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7002166557

Mgr. O. Charlebois, O.M.I., V.A., chez les Esquimaux : notes de voyage, visite pastorale, ordination, etc.

2014· article· fr· W7002166557 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Analysis with R
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSet (abstract data type)Subject (documents)Class (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les Missionnaires Oblats de Marie Immacule ont les premiers pris contact avec les Esquimaux sur quatre tendues des terres arctiques amricaines.(1) En 1860, l'embouchure du fleuve Mackenzie; en 1873, sur la cte Nord de l'Alaska et jus- que dans la Mer de Behring; en 1911, depuis le Nord du Grand Lac de l'Ours au Golfe du Couronnement et dans l'Ile Vic- toria; enfin, en 1912, du Lac Caribou Chcstcrjield Inlet.On sait dj que de- puis plus d'un demi-sicle, les Oblats sont les seuls semeurs de la foi dans les glaces polaires du Canada.La mission de Chesterficld Inlet, cause de l'hrosme incomparable de ses missionnaires, a mrit d'tre qualifie "le plus beau chef-d'oeuvre de la foi catholique au XXe sicle."Ds 1868, le Pre Gast partit du Lac Caribou et tenta une rencontre avec les Esquimaux du Nord-Ouest de la Mer d'Hudson.Vain effort!Trente-deux ans plus tard, le Pre Arsne Turquetil arri- vait au Lac Caribou.Le futur "aptre polaire", hritier des saints dsirs du PreGast, travailla douze ans avant d'atteindre les Esquimaux.En 1912, il arrivait Chesterfield Inlet, ayant pris la route par (1) Ajoutons qu'en 1875, le R. P. Z. Laasse, O.lM.I., tait aussi missionnaire chez Les Esquimaux du Labrador.mer (Montral, Golfe

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.010
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicData Analysis with RFrench-language works237,207