MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7002205914

The microbial diversity of watermelon snow

2021· dissertation· en· W7002205914 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPolar Research and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowMetagenomicsAlgaeBiodiversityEphemeral keyPsychrophileMicrobiomeThreatened species
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During summer months in alpine systems around the world patches of green, orange and red snow appear. The phenomenon is sometimes called watermelon snow and is caused by a bloom of microalgae. The resulting microbiome is teeming with life, including algae, fungi, metazoans, other protists and bacteria. Here, I present data documenting the biological diversity in the ephemeral snow algae microbiome, which grows on snows threatened by global warming. I began by asking: what microbes are found in snow algae blooms? I focussed my work in the southwestern Coastal Mountain Range in B.C., Canada. The data I present detail the algal, bacterial, fungal, metazoan and other protist diversity in blooms and their distribution across the region. These data included sequences from undescribed algal species, with some potentially belonging to species names with no DNA data available. I therefore did an analysis, including five novel algal isolates, to clarify the taxonomy of Raphidonema and its sister genera, using genetic data. I was able to identify my five isolates as R. sempervirens, and in the process name two novel species: R. catena and R. monicae. As bacteria are commonly important mutualistic symbionts of microalgae, I next described their communities living alongside snow algae. I found that, unlike algae, the bacterial community composition does not change with elevation, and instead there are regionally widespread bacteria. I therefore wanted to learn more about the metabolic capabilities of these bacteria common to snow algae blooms. Using a shotgun metagenomics approach, I analyzed the bacterial metagenome, and metagenomically assembled genomes. These data included representative from the widespread bacterial families found during metabarcoding, and I furthered that analysis by describing their metabolic genes related to: nitrogen and sulfur cycling as well as biosynthesis of osmolytes/cryoprotectants, B-vitamins, phytohormones, and xanthophyll pigments. These data act as observations to form hypotheses on the biogeochemistry and microbial ecology of snow algae microbiomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)Same topicPolar Research and EcologyFrench-language works237,207