The 22nd Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments and Water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conference at a Glance\nMonday, October 16, 2006\nWorkshop #1: 8:30am - 5:00pm\nWorkshop #2: 9:00am - 5:00pm\nWorkshop #3: 10:00am - 5:00pm\nWorkshops #4, 5 & 6: 1:00pm - 5:00pm\nWorkshop #10: 2:00 - 5:00pm\nWorkshop #1: Evaluating Monitored Natural Attenuation of MTBE and TBA\nWorkshop #2: Getting to Closure at LNAPL Sites\nWorkshop #3: In-Situ Chemical Oxidation Workshop\nWorkshop #4: The Role of Anaerobic Biodegradation Processes in Passive and Enhanced Monitored Natural Attenuation Programs\nWorkshop #5: The 2006 MCP Audit- A Case Study Approach\nWorkshop #6: Integrating the Remediation Strategy into the Lifecycle of a Contaminated Sediments Project\nWorkshop #10: Environmental Fate of Hydrocarbons in Soils and Groundwater\nTuesday, October 17, 2006\nMorning\n8:30am - 9:00am Conference Welcome and Overview\n9:00am - Noon Sessions are concurrent\nSession 1: Risk Assessment\nSession 2: Site Assessment\nSession 3: Legal/Regulatory\nSession 4: Heavy Metals\nSession 5: Combining Chemical and Biological Technologies for Soil and Groundwater Remediation\nAfternoon 1:30pm - 5:30pm Sessions are concurrent\nSession 1: Environmental Biotechnology\nSession 2: Analysis\nSession 3: Ozone Remedial Barrier and Clean-up systems for Fuel and Solvent Spills\nSession 4: Emerging Contaminants\nSession 5: Phytoremediation\nPoster Session 4:00 - 6:00pm, Exhibit Area, First Floor, Campus Center\nSocial 4:30-6:00pm, Exhibit Area, First Floor, Campus Center\nWorkshops Evening, 7:00 - 10:00pm\nWorkshop #7: Applied Chemical Fingerprinting in Environmental Forensics\nWorkshop #8: In-Situ Thermal Remediation\nWednesday, October 18, 2006\nMorning 8:30am - Noon Sessions are concurrent\nSession 1: Environmental Benefits and Risks of Nanomaterials\nSession 2: Chemical Oxidation\nSession 3: Environmental Forensics\n*Session 4A: Oxygenates and Public Water Supplies\n*Session 4B: Evaluating and Management of Small Releases from USTs\nAfternoon 1:30pm - 5:30pm Sessions are concurrent\nSession 1: Remediation\nSession 2: Natural Resource Damage Assessments: Integrating Remediation and Restoration\nSession 3: Perchlorate\n*Session 4A: Oxygenate Biodegradation\n*Session 4B: Ethanol Fuels\n*Please note: Sessions 4A and 4Bmorning and afternoon will run concurrently with the other sessions, BUT the presentation times will not be the same as presentation times for Sessions 1, 2 and 3. Please consult the final program for presentation times\nPoster Session 4:00 - 6:00pm, Exhibit Area, First Floor, Campus Center\nSocial 4:30-6:00pm, Exhibit Area, First Floor, Campus Center\nWorkshops Evening, 7:00 - 10:00pm\nWorkshop #9: Down-Gradient Property Status: Practices and Pitfalls\nWorkshop #10 has been moved to Monday, October 16, 2006, from 2:00 - 5:00pm.\nThursday, October 19, 2006\nMorning 8:30am -Noon Sessions are concurrent\nSession 1: Vapor Intrusion\nSession 2: Implementing Aggressive Remediation Strategies\nSession 3: Bioremediation\nSession 4: Contaminated Sites Research in Canada & the Contaminated Sites Action Plan\nAfternoon 1:30pm – 5:30pm Sessions are concurrent\nSession 1: Sediments\nSession 2: Arsenic\nSession 3A: Brownfields\nSession 3B: Environmental Fate\nSession 4: Pesticides
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.182 | 0.069 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".