MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7002278610

Movement and habitat-use of the Great Basin Spadefoot (Spea Intermontana) at its northern range limit

2012· article· en· W7002278610 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of EnvironmentNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaThompson Rivers University
KeywordsHabitatThreatened speciesGrasslandRange (aeronautics)Structural basinHome rangeAridDrainage basinEcosystemPlateau (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Great Basin Spadefoot (Spea intermontana) ranges from Arizona to British Columbia (BC) in western North America, being typically associated with arid environments. However, at the northern limit of the species (south-central BC), the ecosystem contains only small patches of grassland interspersed within a forested landscape, and the climate is cool and wet compared to the core of the spadefoot range. Due to the threatened status of spadefoots in BC, breeding ponds have been identified, but effective management requires data on habitat use away from these bodies of water. Using telemetry, I examined movement patterns and determined habitat associations of diurnal retreat sites (shallow self-made or pre-existing burrows) for these animals. I was able to track 19 spadefoots for varying lengths of time over two active seasons in 2009 and 2010. In general, telemetered spadefoots showed periodic, eruptive movements, where single (used one time only) or core (used multiple times) retreat sites were utilized for a period of time, prior to larger movements that took the animal to another area (with another set of retreat sites). Often retreat sites were used repeatedly; individuals would emerge to forage, travel to breeding ponds, and/or utilize other sites, sometimes retracing their movement patterns over large distances. The majority of terrestrial habitat used was within 112 m from breeding ponds and 136 m was the average maximum displacement, although telemetered spadefoots ventured up to 370 m from aquatic habitat. Grassland and forest path habitat-types types were selected by spadefoots at a higher proportion than in random locations. At a smaller scale within these macro-habitats, spadefoots selected for retreat sites containing higher proportions of bare ground and rock compared to random locations. This study provides much-needed background information on the behaviour and terrestrial habitat preferences of Great Basin spadefoots, and can be used to inform management strategies for this species at the northern extent of their geographic range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)Same topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207