MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7002465366

Non-canonical IDH-Mutant Astrocytomas: Prevalence, Natural History, and Survival Analysis

2023· dissertation· en· W7002465366 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural (archaeology)Survival analysisNatural deathPopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction:Mutations of the IDH gene have been proposed to exhibit a significant role in the tumorigenesis, progression, and prognosis of gliomas.The most common mutation is a missense mutation that affects amino acid residue 132 and is associated with longer survival in patients with glioma than in patients with glioma without IDH1 mutations.Other non-R132H mutations known as non-canonical IDH mutations are less common (7-20%). Objectives:We aimed to provide a detailed and comprehensive analysis of the non-canonical IDHmutant astrocytomas in this single-center cohort, looking at the prevalence, natural history, and prognosis of this tumor in a real-world setting. Hypothesis:We hypothesize that the results of this clinical review would help in identifying the natural history of the non-canonical IDH mutated astrocytomas and help in decision-making in treating patients harboring the mutations. Methods:We identified 115 patients (1993-2022) with IDH1/2 mutated astrocytomas and analyzed the molecular markers, patient characteristics, histology, treatment, recurrence and/or progression, PFS, and OS. Results:Eighteen patients (15.6%) were harboring the non-canonical IDH mutations (R132C 44%, R132S 33%, R132G 17%, and R172M 6%).Patients with non-canonical IDH-mutant astrocytomas were younger with a median age at diagnosis of 35-year (p=0.009).Right hemispheric involvement was more common in the non-canonical group (61%), with frontal lobe predominance (50%).In both groups, there was a higher prevalence of WHO grade 2/3 astrocytomas than grade four astrocytomas.Interestingly, 17% of the non-canonical were of grade 4 upon initial diagnosis.Recurrence and/or progression were seen in 55% of the noncanonical cohort.Longer PFS was observed in non-canonical astrocytomas with lower WHO grade (p=0.01), and in patients treated with GTR compared to STR (p= 0.035).Higher WHO grade of the non-canonical associated with shorter OS (p= 0.01).Similarly, a higher WHO grade of recurrence was associated with poor OS post-recurrence (p< 0.01).R132H-mutant astrocytomas showed longer OS when compared to the non-canonical IDH-mutant astrocytomas.However, the overall survival did not differ significantly between the two cohorts (p= 0.59). Conclusion:This is one of the largest retrospectives, real-life datasets describing the prevalence and the natural history of the non-canonical IDH-mutant astrocytomas which was not reported before.Due to the nature of the study and the small sample size, our analysis failed to show a strong correlation between the non-canonical IDH-mutant astrocytomas and the R132H mutation and the OS.Additional studies should be conducted with larger sample sizes and should also assess the type and dose of chemotherapy/radiotherapy used in non-canonical IDH-mutant astrocytoma.ATRX: α-thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked Bx: Biopsy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders→French-language works237,207→