Bibliographic record
Abstract
5itE 0145 MICHAEL Hello and welcome to episode 0145 of Five in the Eye, Colourful Radio’s weekly news review show. As always, we’re broadcasting across the web and also on DAB in Glasgow, Manchester and Birmingham. Whatever way you’re choosing to listen, we’re very glad you’ve joined us. In London, this is me, Michael Ohajuru. PHIL And joining Michael this week from Sunderland in the North East of England, this is Phil Woodford - looking forward to looking back over five of the stories that have caught our eye over the past seven days. So, what’s on the list Michael? MICHAEL Well, at number one, we’re asking where the boundaries lie when it comes to offence. Comic Ricky Gervais - best known as David Brent from The Office - has run into trouble over his stand-up routine, where he made jokes people are allege are ‘transphobic’. PHIL Yes. Maybe there is some allowance for a comedian. But what about a commercial brand like Heineken. They are in trouble over a controversial ad. Story number two is the news that there’s scientific evidence that we should actually trust our gut feelings. MICHAEL I know that feeling in the pit of my stomach. Sometimes things smell right and other times they just don’t. It’s good to know I can trust my instincts. Our third story? Well there’s been a lot of huffing and puffing over the decision by right-wingers Austria to block a ban on smoking in public places. PHIL Well, I remember what pubs and cafes were like when I was young and I’d hate to go back to that. You’d stink of smoke when you went home! Story number four is about a waiter in Canada. He was fired for being rude, but is complaining that people had misunderstood. MICHAEL Yes, apparently he was just being French . Ooh la la! And to complete the five this week, it’s the couple who ordered an an owl for their wedding, who would swoop down with the ring. Unfortunately, the terrifying bird went straight for the best man! PHIL It sounds like a hoot! And that’s this week’s Five in the Eye. ++++
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.800 | 0.076 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".