Otistik çocuk ebeveynlerinin geniş otizm fenotipi ve aleksitimi özellikleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bu araştırmada, otistik bireylerin ebeveynlerinin geniş otizm fenotipi ve aleksitimi özellikleri ve aralarındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek amacı ile ilişkisel tarama modeli kullanılarak yapılmıştır. \nAraştırmanın örneklemini, İstanbul ili sınırlarında yaşayan 270 otizm tanısı almış bireyin, 266 anne ve 228 baba olmak üzere toplam 494 ebeveyni oluşturmuştur. Araştırmada, Ebeveyn Bilgi Formu, geniş otizm fenotipi özelliklerini değerlendirmek amacıyla Otizm Spektrum Anketi ve Toronto Aleksitimi Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. \nAraştırmadan elde edilen bulgular sonucunda, annelerin %56,8’inin, babaların %60,4’ünün aleksitimik özellikler gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. Otistik bireylerin annelerinin Otizm Spektrum Anketi’nden aldıkları puanların aritmetik ortalaması 19.80, babalarının 21.01, olarak bulunmuştur. \nOtistik bireylerin ebeveynlerinin Toronto Aleksitimi Ölçeği puanları mesleklerine göre anlamlı bir farklılık gösterdiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Babalarının Toronto Aleksitimi Ölçeği puanları engelli yakınlarının olması durumuna göre, annelerinin ise el tercihi durumuna göre farklılık gösterdiği bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Babaların, Otizm Spektrum Anketi puanları yaş, cinsiyet ve eşleri ile akraba olması değişkenlerine göre farklılık göstermektedir. \nOtistik bireylerin annelerinin Toronto Aleksitimi Ölçeği toplam test puanı ile Otizm Spektrum Anketi Sosyal Beceri, Dikkati Kaydırabilme, İletişim, Hayal Gücü alt ölçek puanları, babalarının ise Dikkati Kaydırabilme, İletişim, Hayal Gücü alt ölçek puanları ve Otizm Spektrum Anketi toplam puanı arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.\nAnahtar Kelimeler: Otistik çocuk ebeveynleri, geniş otizm fenotipi, aleksitimi\nABSTRACT\nThis study is aimed to determine Broad Autism Phenotype and Alexithymia properties of the parents of autistic children and the relationship between them. The study was prepared in accordance with the model of relational research to answer the following questions:\nThe study sample is consisted of 270 autism diagnosed individuals their parents ( 266 mother, 228 father) with a total population of 494 people. \nIn the study, Parental Information Form; in order to assess broader autism phenotype characteristics, Autism Spectrum Quotient and in order to assess the alexithymic properties, Toronto Alexithymia Scale were used.\nAccording to the research findings, % 56.8 of mothers and %60.4 of fathers show alexithymia features. Arithmetic average of the scores of the mothers of the autistic individuals in Autism Spectrum Quotient is 19.80, arithmetic average of the scores of the fathers of the autistic individuals in Autism Spectrum Quotient is 21.01.\nIt was concluded that Toronto Alexithymia Scale scores of the parents of the autistic individuals show a meaningful/significant difference in accordance with their occupations. This study also found that Toronto Alexithymia Scale scores of the fathers differ according to the existence of their relatives with disabilities, and for mothers, Toronto Alexithymia Scale scores show difference in connection with the handing preferences. \nFathers of autistic individuals, Autism Spectrum Quotient Scores show difference according to age, gender, occupation, relatives with disabilities, relationship of the parents and handing preferences variables. \nFinally, there is a significant relationship between Toronto Alexithymia Scale total test score and Autism Spectrum Quotient Social skills, Attention Switching, Communication, Imagination subscale scores of mothers of autistic individuals and Attention Switching, Communication, Imagination subscale scores and Autism Spectrum Quotient total score of fathers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".