MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7004765435

Nydelig dovenskab

2013· other· en· W7004765435 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNuclear Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthosFocus (optics)PoliticsCynicismContext (archaeology)Political ethicsRelation (database)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis explores the concepts of capitalism, stigmatization, adaptation and ethics, in\nrelation to concepts of desire, enjoyment, cynicism and the unconscious, derived from\npsychoanalysis. The context for the thesis is, that there is an increased focus in society\ntowards consuming and enjoying and, at the same time, a focus on political correctness\nand tolerance towards minorities. The theory behind these ideas is, that these two fields of\nattention tend to work against each other, with consumption being the cause of a\nstigmatization, and political correctness seeking to prevent the same stigmatization. This\nseems to create a mismatch in ethical focus or, in the words of Slovenian philosopher\nSlavoj Žižek, an ethical illusion.\nWith an overall focus on stigmatization, the investigation explores two different cases. The\nfirst case involves a native community in the north of Canada, threatened by a forthcoming\nexpansion of a major oil refinery. The second case involves an unemployed citizen, who\nrecently publicly declared, that he doesn't want to work in return for his social welfare. On\nthe basis of these two cases, the thesis aims to show how 1) the concept of stigmatization\nand ethics has changed in a modern capitalistic economy, and 2) how this calls for a\ndifferent way of thinking ethics, in relation to helping minorities out of their position as\nbeing marginalized or stigmatized.\nThe result of the investigation shows how modern society, in it's transformation from a\nfocus on a religious ethos to a focus on accumulation of capital, lacks an overall ethos,\nand therefore, makes it easier to stigmatize minorities, and in a more subtle way. At the\nsame time the investigation shows, how a sudden 'happening' in society can change the\nrhetorical approach on political correctness, making already stigmatized people become\neven more stigmatized. It also shows how this happening can serve as a foundation for a\nnew critical thinking, from outside of the system. The ethical outcome of the happening is\ndetermined, not by the happening in itself but by how the happening is capable of making\nsociety think about it's own lack of ethical thinking. If successful, a new ethical thinking is\ndeveloped, that can work towards helping these stigmatized minorities out of their current\nsituation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0990.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School)Same topicNuclear Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207