PENGARUH SENAM A-PIK (ANTI PIKUN) TERHADAP FUNGSI KOGNITIF PADA ORANG DENGAN DEMENSIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PENGARUH SENAM A-PIK (ANTI PIKUN) TERHADAP FUNGSI KOGNITIF PADA ORANG DENGAN DEMENSIA \n \nProses penuaan pada lanjut usia akan berdampak pada masalah kesehatan salah satu fungsional yang terganggu adalah fungsi kognitif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh senam A-Pik terhadap fungsi kognitif pada orang dengan demensia (ODD). Penelitian ini menggunakan Pre Experimental dengan desain One Group Pretest-Posttest design. Teknik pengambilan sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah purposive sampling dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 22 lansia dengan demensia ringan. Instrument yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah tes Montreal Cognitive Assesment (MoCA) versi Indonesia untuk mengukur fungsi kognitif yang di adopsi dari (Husein, Lumempouw, Ramli, & Herqutanto, 2010). Analisis penelitian menggunakan uji paired sample t-Test pada SPSS versi 25, dengan menunjukkan p value 0.00 < 0.05 sehingga H1 diterima. Simpulan hasil penelitian ini adalah terdapat pengaruh senam A-Pik terhadap fungsi kognitif pada orang dengan demensia. Rekomendasi hasil penelitian selanjutnya yaitu diharapkan jumlah responden yang relatif banyak untuk dibandingkan pengaruh senam A-Pik (Anti Pikun) dengan variabel lainnya dan desain penelitian dapat menggunakan true experiment design. Diharapkan senam A-Pik ini dapat dijadikan sebagai pilihan pembinaan olahraga lansia secara rutin. \n \nTHE EFFECT OF A-PIK (ANTIDEMENTIA) EXERCISE ON THE COGNITIVE FUNCTION IN PEOPLE WITH DEMENTIA \n \nThe aging process in the elderly has an impact on health problems. One of the functions affected is cognitive function. This research aims at finding out the effect of A-Pik exercise on cognitive function in people with dementia (ODD). This research employed a Pre Experimental method with a One Group Pretest-Posttest design. The sampling technique employed in this research was purposive sampling with a total sample of 22 elderly suffering from mild dementia. The instrument used in this research was the Indonesian version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test to measure cognitive function adopted from (Husein, Lumempouw, Ramli, & Herqutanto, 2010). In the research analysis, the paired sample T-test was used in SPSS version 25, which showed a p-value of 0.00 < 0.05 to make the H1 accepted. It can be concluded that A-Pik exercise affected cognitive function in people with dementia. As a recommendation, further research is expected to employ a relatively large number of respondents to compare the effects of A-Pik (Antidementia) exercise with other variables and to use a true experimental research design. This A-Pik exercise can be used as an option for routine exercise for the elderly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".