MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7004862382

The Open Skies Treaty: Observation Overflights of Military Activities

2000· report· en· W7004862382 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · 2000
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpen skiesTreatyFraming (construction)Arms controlNorth Atlantic Treaty
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On March 24, 1992, the United States, Canada, and 22 European nations signed the Treaty on Open Skies.The United States officially ratified the treaty on November 3, 1993.The treaty has not yet entered into force, however, because Russia and Belarus have not yet ratified it.President Bush revived the Open Skies concept in May 1989.At the time, the United States believed that the Open Skies concept would reduce the chances of military confrontation and build confidence in Europe by providing participants with the ability to collect information about the military forces and activities of others in the treaty.In addition, even though the United States and Russia can collect this type of information with sophisticated observation satellites, Open Skies observation flights will provide nations who do not have their own satellites with a way to participate in the data collection and confidence-building process.The parties to the Treaty on Open Skies have agreed to permit unarmed aircraft to conduct observation flights over their entire territories.The United States Air Force has modified three C-135 aircraft for this purpose.Open Skies aircraft can be equipped with four types of sensors: optical panoramic and framing cameras; video cameras; infrared line-scanning devices; and sideways-looking synthetic aperture radars.These sensors must be based on off-the-shelf technology that is available to all participants in the treaty.The treaty includes quotas that specify maximum numbers of observation flights that can occur within each nation each year and the maximum number of observation flights each nation can conduct each year.For the United States, these quotas are 42 flights per year; however, only 4 flights will occur over U.S. territory in the first year that the treaty is in force.In addition, the United States will conduct only 9 observation flights during the first year of treaty implementation; 8 over Russia and Belarus and one, in conjunction with Canada, over Ukraine.When the Senate reviewed the Open Skies Treaty in 1992 and 1993, Members raised several concerns about the implications of the treaty for the United States.For example, some were concerned that the costs of outfitting and operating the U.S. Open Skies aircraft would outweigh the benefits that the United States would receive by participating in the treaty.As a result, the Senate suggested that the United States restrict its participation, conducting fewer than the 42 permitted observation flights per year.Some were also concerned about potential risks to U.S. security from observation flights that would gather information on U.S. military forces and activities.If the Open Skies Treaty remains in force for many years, the United States could host dozens of visits by other participants, with foreign military aircraft equipped with sensors flying over U.S. territory.Virtually all observers agree, however, that these flights will pose no security threat to the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0160.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas)Same topicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyFrench-language works237,207