Bibliographic record
Abstract
Focus and research aims: This work is based on research into the emigrant journeys made by destitute girls from the Maria Rye home in Peckham to Canada in the 19th century and that of my birth mother travelling in the company of many stateless refuges in the early 1950s. It continues my focus on the articulation of broken narratives and develops the style explored in earlier work where elements of narrativity are used to create work that lies between document and affect. The video, based on location filming in Canada and constructed sequences, is projected through the panels of glass etched with fragments taken from archival texts and a sea chart relating to these 2 journeys. Each section of the video may be seen independently of the whole. The intentionality is to create open texts, which allow different interpretations to be made by the spectator. One of the aims is to create a style of visual storytelling and develop a language, which allows for a creative reinterpretation of history, memory and loss. A part of this concerns the reconfiguration of the archive, developing a creative response to primary archival sources, which encourage a non literal (literary) response to information and language.\n\nMethods and processes: Both Video and etched glass pieces are based on research into primary sources held in archives both in Britain and Canada, these include The National Archives, London Metropolitan Archives, National Maritime Museum (UK) Nottman Photographic archive, McGill University Montreal, Universite de Laval, Quebec, Museum of Niagara on the Lake.\n\nThe Video also uses location filming in Canada and constructed sequences.\n\nDissemination; This was shown as part of The Voyage Out exhibition at The Dock Museum, Barrow in Furness 2003.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.089 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".