Perfil del personal y su desempeño laboral en la gerencia de creditos de la asociacion mujeres en acción (AMA) , Trujillo - 1er. trimestre del 2017
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study was carried out in order to determine the “PROFILE OF THE \nPERSONNEL AND ITS PERFORMANCE IN THE CREDIT MANAGEMENT OF THE \nWOMEN IN ACTION ASSOCIATION (AMA), TRUJILLO - 1ER. QUARTER OF 2017. \nThe statement of the problem is: Is the personnel profile adjusted to their work performance in \nthe Credit Management of the Women in Action Association (AMA), Trujillo - 1er. Quarter of \n2017? Whose research hypothesis is: The profile of the personnel required by the position is \nadjusted to their work performance in the Credit Management of the Women in Action \nAssociation (AMA). \n \nThe correlational descriptive design was used, using the survey technique, and as a \nquestionnaire instrument, the same that was validated through the application of the Cronbach \nAlpha coefficient. \nLikewise, the personnel directly involved in the Credit Management of the Women in Action \nAssociation (AMA), made up of a total of 17 workers, were considered as a representative \nsample to analyze the job profile and the work performance in the institution. \n \nThe results of the research have allowed the analysis of job profile and job performance in the \nCredit Management of the Women in Action Association (AMA), in the city of Trujillo, \nduring the 1st. Quarter of 2017 and determine if the profile of the personnel is adjusted to their \nwork performance in the Credit Management of the Women in Action Association (AMA). \n \nThe results of the investigation have determined that the collaborators of the Credit \nManagement in their majority are adjusted to the profiles of the position and present a work \nperformance between regular and good.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it