MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005164543

?potekli konut finansman? ve T?rkiye de?erlendirmesi

2015· dissertation· tr· W7005164543 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace Repository · 2015
Typedissertation
Languagetr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Work (physics)Capital (architecture)SecuritizationApartment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Etkili bir konut finansman sistemi, hem t?keticilerin konut talebinin kar??lanmas? hem de in?aat ve finans sekt?rlerinin geli?imi a??s?ndan b?y?k ?neme sahiptir. Sistem, konut kredilerinden olu?an alacaklara dayal? sermaye piyasas? ara?lar?n?n ihrac? suretiyle i?lerlik kazanmaktad?r. K?saca "menkul k?ymetle?tirme" denilen bu sistem tezin ana konusunu olu?turmaktad?r. 2007 y?l?n?n ilk ?eyre?inde ipotekli konut finansman kanunu T?rkiye'de yasala?m??t?r. 2007 y?l?n?n ikinci yar?s?nda ise ABD'de ba?layan "mortgage" kaynakl? k?resel mali kriz t?m d?nyay? etkisi alt?na alm??t?r. Bu gerek?eler konuya olan ilgiyi art?rm??t?r. Bu geli?meler ?er?evesinde ipotekli konut finansman sisteminin ?lkemiz uygulamalar?nda daha s?k tart???laca?? ve geli?meye a??k oldu?u ifade edilebilir. Bu tezde ipotekli konut finansman sisteminin ?nemi ve T?rkiye'de uygulanabilirli?i ele al?nmaktad?r. Bu ?er?evede ilk b?l?mde ipotekli konut finansman sisteminin genel ?zellikleri, taraflar? ve ara?lar? ile ilgili bilgiler verilmektedir. ?kinci b?l?mde d?nyada ipotekli konut finansman sisteminin uygulamalar? anlat?lm??t?r. Son b?l?mde ise T?rkiye'de yak?n ge?mi?te yasala?an ipotekli konut finansman kanununun getirdi?i yeniliklere ve sistemine yer verilmi?tir. Anahtar Kelimeler: ?potekli konut finansman sistemi, menkul k?ymetle?tirme, konut finansman?, konut kredileri. An efficient housing finance system has a big role in both meeting housing demands for the consumers and in the development of the construction and finance sectors in the economy. The housing finance system begins to function thereby the capital markets instruments issue provided by securitization of the receivables which arises from housing loan. Shortly system of the name "securitization" is the main subject of thesis. In the first quarter of 2007 mortgage law has been legislated. In the second half of the 2007, financial crisis originated from mortgage has started in USA which causes global effects. All these reasons increase our interest in this subject. Therefore?? it can be stated that in our country's applications mortgage will be argued more often and tend to progression. In this thesis, the importance of housing finance system and applicability in Turkey has been studied. In the first section of this study, general characteristics, institutions and instruments of housing finance system are explained. Applications of the housing finance system in the world take place in the second section of the thesis. In the last section, recently innovations brought by the mortgage law were legislated and its system in Turkey is examined. Keywords: Mortgage, securitization, housing finance, housing loans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it