Physical activity participant: engagement toward cognitive and physical function among rural veteran’s athletes / Siti Maizatul Akmal Mahbur and Wahidah Tumijan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Engaging in physical activity is essential for preserving and enhancing cognitive and physical abilities, particularly for rural veteran athletes. Nevertheless, there is a dearth of research documenting the outcomes specifically for this age group. The study aimed to determine the relationship between physical activity, cognitive function, and physical function among rural veteran athletes. A cross-sectional correlational design was used. Data was collected using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Sports Performance Physical Battery Test – Chair Stand Test (SPPB), Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+), and Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS). There is a significant moderately positive relationship (r = 0.460, p = 0.009) between physical activity for all activities and cognitive performance. Physical function showed a non-significant correlation (r = 0.346, p = 0.057) with physical activity for all activities. In conclusion, rural veteran athletes engage in a substantial amount of physical activity, meeting or exceeding recommended guidelines. There is a positive relationship between physical activity levels and cognitive function, indicating that higher physical activity is associated with better mental health. The relationship between physical activity and physical function is weak, suggesting that while physical activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".