Bibliographic record
Abstract
(1) Post card to Miss J. Bradt, Jordan, Ont. from her sister (K. or R.?), postmarked 18 \nApril 1891. Her sister writes “…while Jimmie(?) was at work in the shop he got \nbadly burnt in the face…I hardly know what to do for him. I suppose you will not \nget this until Monday and the roads are so bad. He says it is not as painful as it \nwas”. \n(2) Post card to Peter Bradt, Pelham Union from C.S. Petty, dated at Jordan, 14 \nSeptember 1891. Petty writes “…we would like to have those window lights & \nsash that you were going to get—we are anxious to have them put in as soon as \npossible”. \n(3) Post card to Peter Bradt, Pelham Union, from James J. Bradt, postmarked \nBeamsville, 18 April 1892. James writes “…you have a number of old machines \nthat I suppose you will not use, they would come good to me for old iron at \npresent. Please let me know about them, could you bring them up…” \n(4) Post card to P.H.L. Bradt, Pelham Union from Cole H. Hill, dated at Woodstock, 4 \nJuly 1892. The note inquires about Bradt’s availability for a visit that week. \n(5) Post card to P.H.L. Bradt, Jordan, Ont. from S.K. Moyer, dated at Toronto, 21 \nSeptember 1892, re: an order of fruit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".