Bibliographic record
Abstract
(1) Post card to Peter Bradt, Pelham Union, from Alfred Page, dated at Smithville, 15 March 1894. Page writes “…I have a job to do before I can come down and help you—it will be a week or ten days before I can come if that will do…please answer this card.” (2) Post card to Peter H.L. Bradt, Pelham Union, from James J. Bradt, dated 21 May, 1894. James writes “…I will meet you as you desire on Wednesday. Can you make the St. Catharines Station at train time between ten and eleven a.m. and I will ride up to the city with you…” (3) Post card to Peter H.L. Bradt, Pelham Union, from James J. Bradt, dated at Beamsville, 4 July 1894. James writes “On account of some friends coming from Buffalo I will not be able to come today…” (4) Post card to Lt. Col. Smith, House of Commons, Ottawa, from Richard W.?, dated at Kingston, 4 July 1894. The note states “...at present absent from house & will be away for about a week on his return…Gallweys report…will be handed to him…” (5) Post card to Peter H.L. Bradt, Pelham Union, from the Canadian Express Company, dated at Jordan Station, 5 July 1894. (6) Post card to P.H.L. Bradt, Pelham Union, from P.H. Cline (Clive?), dated at Jordan Station, 6 November 1894. Cline writes “As the potatoes are all ready to move tomorrow will you kindly come down and see about them…” (7) Post card to Peter H.L. Bradt, Pelham Union, from James J Bradt, dated at Beamsville, 21st/1894. James writes “I will come out tomorrow afternoon if the weather is fine enough. I am going to the lake this morning…”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.913 | 0.867 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".