Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(1) Post card to Peter Bradt, Pelham Union, from Alfred Page, dated at Smithville, 15 \nMarch 1894. Page writes “…I have a job to do before I can come down and help \nyou—it will be a week or ten days before I can come if that will do…please answer \nthis card.” \n(2) Post card to Peter H.L. Bradt, Pelham Union, from James J. Bradt, dated 21 May, \n1894. James writes “…I will meet you as you desire on Wednesday. Can you make \nthe St. Catharines Station at train time between ten and eleven a.m. and I will ride \nup to the city with you…” \n(3) Post card to Peter H.L. Bradt, Pelham Union, from James J. Bradt, dated at \nBeamsville, 4 July 1894. James writes “On account of some friends coming from \nBuffalo I will not be able to come today…” \n(4) Post card to Lt. Col. Smith, House of Commons, Ottawa, from Richard W.?, dated \nat Kingston, 4 July 1894. The note states “...at present absent from house & \nwill be away for about a week on his return…Gallweys report…will be handed \nto him…” \n(5) Post card to Peter H.L. Bradt, Pelham Union, from the Canadian Express Company, \ndated at Jordan Station, 5 July 1894. \n(6) Post card to P.H.L. Bradt, Pelham Union, from P.H. Cline (Clive?), dated at Jordan \nStation, 6 November 1894. Cline writes “As the potatoes are all ready to move \ntomorrow will you kindly come down and see about them…” \n(7) Post card to Peter H.L. Bradt, Pelham Union, from James J Bradt, dated at \nBeamsville, 21st/1894. James writes “I will come out tomorrow afternoon if \nthe weather is fine enough. I am going to the lake this morning…”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it