MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7005246360

Prevention of anal human papillomavirus infection via use of a carrageenan-based gel and HPV vaccination in gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men

2024· dissertation· en· W7005246360 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHealth CanadaCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcGill University Health CentreMerck CanadaUniversité de MontréalConcordia UniversityMcGill University
KeywordsHuman papillomavirusMen who have sex with menVaccinationIncidence (geometry)HPV infectionAnal canal
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BackgroundGay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM) are disproportionately affected by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and would benefit from preventive measures.Carrageenan, a red algae derivative, inhibits HPV infection in vitro and in vivo.However, the Lubricant Investigation in Men to Inhibit Transmission of HPV Infection (LIMIT-HPV)randomized control trial found that carrageenan use neither influenced anal HPV infection acquisition nor clearance in gbMSM.In addition, although gbMSM are eligible for HPV vaccination in Canada, there is a need for observational studies assessing its real-world impact on anal HPV infections in this at-risk population.construction.Les estimations ont été ajustées en fonction d'un score de propension permettant de prédire la positivité du VPH dans l'ensemble de l'étude, sur la base de certaines caractéristiques des participants et de l'étude. RésultatsDans le manuscrit 1, bien que la variation nette médiane de la charge virale ait été plus élevée dans le groupe traité que dans le groupe placebo, ces différences n'étaient pas significatives (VPH16 : 0,68 contre 0,18 copies/cellule, P=0,60 ; VPH18 : 18,32 contre 10,12 copies/cellule, P=0,52).Dans le manuscrit 2, 23,3 % des participants étaient vaccinés contre le VPH au début de l'étude.L'incidence des VPH ciblés par le vaccin était plus faible chez les participantes vaccinées que chez les participantes non vaccinées (n=754, rapport de risques (HR)=0,22, intervalle de confiance à 95% (IC)=0,00-0,79).La vaccination contre le VPH n'a pas été associée à l'incidence au sein d'une même espèce (n=2299, HR=0,76, IC=0,42-1,24) ou entre espèces (n=3774, HR=1,27, IC=0,88-1,83) des VPH. ConclusionsDans le manuscrit 1, l'utilisation de carraghénane n'a pas eu d'impact sur la charge virale des VPH 16 ou 18 dans l'anus, ce qui peut expliquer l'absence d'effet protecteur chez les gbHARSAH.Dans le manuscrit 2, les résultats confirment que la vaccination contre le VPH prévient les infections anales incidentes des types de VPH ciblés par le vaccin chez les gbHARSAH.v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, I would like to express my deepest thanks my supervisor, Dr. Eduardo Franco, for the mentorship, direction, and support he has provided over the past two years

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicPlant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies→French-language works237,207→