MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005299626

Proceedings of the Aquaculture Workshop for SEAFDEC/AQD Training Alumni, 8-11 September 1992, Iloilo, Philippines

2014· book· en· W7005299626 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSEAFDEC/AQD Repository (Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center) · 2014
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicERP Systems Implementation and Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSimon Fraser UniversityDalhousie UniversityJapan International Cooperation AgencyInternational Development Research CentreSoutheast Asian Fisheries Development Center/Aquaculture DepartmentSugar Research and Development CorporationUniversity of the PhilippinesUniversität HohenheimInstitut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101DiafiltrationHyporeflexiaProteogenomicsDysgeusiaArticular cartilage damage
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The workshop was conducted to maintain linkage between Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, Aquaculture Department and its alumni. It also aimed to: assess the effectiveness of the training alumni and among trainees; inform alumni of the recent technologies developed by the Department; recommend ways to make the training courses more responsive to the needs of the fish farmers and the aquaculture industry. The training alumni identified several problems regarding the capability of the technical staff in aquaculture, i.e. shrimp seed production, marine fish seed production, grow-out culture, and fish diseases. The contributions of the selected participants during the meeting which are contained in this volume are cited individually.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0930.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSEAFDEC/AQD Repository (Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center)Same topicERP Systems Implementation and ImpactFrench-language works237,207