MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005394101

The 73rd Conference of the International Communication Association, Toronto, Canada, May 25–29, 2023

2023· article· en· W7005394101 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace repository (University of Tartu) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternational communicationGovernment (linguistics)GlobalizationInternational relationsWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTACT SHORT: This panel looks at authenticity in communication via the lenses of media freedom and democracy in contemporary Europe.Through references to findings from the EU-funded project MEDIADELCOM (www.mediadelcom.eu)it looks at the broader cultural contexts alongside diversity (and a mismatch) of democratic media visionstheir interpretations and potential cultural barriers to media freedom implementation.The contributions use various methodologies, including comparative analysis, agent-oriented modelling, and case studies of critical cultural junctures. ABSTRACT (RATIONALE):Media and democracy are challenged everywhere.We all learn from the annual global freedom and human rights that media freedom and related freedom of expression are in crisis, under siege or retreat.Regardless of the cultural and geographical orientations, the image of mission-led responsible media has blended with populism, misinformation, corruption, and the spread of fake news via legacy and data-driven media.While the Nordic countries top the global media freedom ranks, media industries across Europe have experienced political battles over media regulation alongside the weakness of media ethics and professional journalism accountability.In addition, the ongoing societal challenges, such as the War in Ukraine, the effects of COVID-19 and the clashes of values/societal and media polarisation (see, for instance, multiple narratives on migration, the rights of women and LGBT communities, state and church separation, relations with the EU, the Russian Federation, and so on) call for a constant media and democracy reexamination.We argue that the challenges for European media and democracies are twofold.Firstly, an urgent turn from 'the broadcast/print/online' organisational settings towards more agile and community-driven forms has many implications for media democratisation, both regarding employees' pride and motivation and going beyond the sender-receiver with civil society/publics relationships.Secondly, we aim to examine the broader cultural contexts of the European democratic media cultures, alongside diversity (and a mismatch) of democratic

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDSpace repository (University of Tartu)Same topicLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207