MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005618009

Review of For the Love of Metaphysics: Nihilism and the Conflict of Reason from Kant to Rosenzweig, Karin Nisenbaum

2022· review· en· W7005618009 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of OxfordQueen's UniversityUniversity of CambridgeMcGill University
KeywordsNihilismInterpretation (philosophy)GloomCriticismPerspective (graphical)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Preface to the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant warns that freedom and morality 'give way to the mechanism of nature' if we defer to reason's speculative use, which, since it is restricted to the 'natural necessity' of appearances, renders its 'practical extension [. ..] impossible'.It is in light of this that he resolves to 'deny knowledge in order to make room for faith' of the sort that can withstand 'all unbelief conflicting with morality' (Kant Bxxvii-xxx).Kant concludes in the Doctrine of Method that, by preventing speculative 'devastations' to freedom and morality, critique allows us to 'return to metaphysics as to a beloved from whom we have been estranged' and to pursue the 'essential ends of humanity' to which mathematical, scientific, and empirical knowledge have 'value' strictly as 'means' (Kant A849-50/B877-8).This foregrounds Kant's claim in the Dialectic of the Critique of Practical Reason that 'all interest is ultimately practical and even that of speculative reason is only conditional and is complete in practical use alone', from which he infers that we avoid 'a conflict of reason with itself', not by a 'contingent' juxtaposition of speculative and practical reason, but rather by a 'necessary' union of speculative and practical reason in which 'the latter has primacy' (Kant AA 5: 121, emphasis in original).It is for the sake of practical knowing, on whose actuality its object is grounded, that there is theoretical knowing, whose actuality by contrast is grounded on its object.And it is for the sake of practical self-knowing, which produces its object, that there is theoretical other-knowing, which by contrast receives its object (see Engstrom 2013, pp.145-6).German idealism radicalizes the primacy of practical reason, using various argumentative strategies to prove that reason is the all, that is, that reason is unconditionally self-knowing and unconditionally actual such that it produces and grounds its object in every respect (see Hegel GW 12: 238).It is only by proving the identity of reason and the all, or of thought and being, that idealism can overcome presuppositions that leave Kant's practical turn Mind, Vol.00 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)Same topicCell Image Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207