MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005685919

The Regulation of Social Media in Nigeria and its Effect on Free Speech: Perspectives from Constitutional Law and International Norms

2023· dissertation· en· W7005685919 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerbal Medicine Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProportionality (law)DemocracyConstitutionFreedom of the pressSocial mediaConstitutional lawFreedom of expressionBalance (ability)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis explores the multifaceted and evolving topic of social media regulation, with a focus on Nigeria. As social media platforms have become central to communication, information dissemination, and public discourse, concerns have arisen about their impact on individuals, society, and democracy. The research question addressed in this thesis is whether the Nigerian bills on restriction of social media can legally restrict false speech and hate speech without overreaching on the right to freedom of expression, and if not, what measures can be taken to improve these bills.\nThe thesis begins by analyzing three key theories for the justification of freedom of expression, which show that freedom of expression is essential to the discovery of truth, self-autonomy, and promotion of an open and vibrant democratic discourse. However, these theories are not an absolute justification and may be restricted. The thesis also examines the conditions for justification of limits on freedom of expression in Nigeria, which is that the law must be shown to be within reasonable limits permissible in a democratic society. Section 45 of the Nigerian Constitution states specific grounds for the restriction of freedom of expression, but the section is vague as it gives no further direction as to how Nigerian courts should balance competing interests, such as freedom of expression on the one hand and public interest on the other.\nThe thesis argues that the importation of proportionality analysis and international standards is necessary to restrict hate speech and false speech in Nigeria while protecting the right to freedom of expression. The delicate balance between preserving freedom of expression and addressing harmful content, such as hate speech and false information, is a critical consideration in social media regulation.\nThe thesis suggests that drawing from Canadian law and international standards could enhance Nigeria’s regulation of free speech on social media. The thesis concludes that the protection of freedom of expression is crucial, especially in a diverse cultural, political, and socio-economic landscape such as Nigeria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicHerbal Medicine Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207