MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7005748020

The role of social context and anticipatory anxiety in social anxiety risk for pre-drinking.

2020· dissertation· en· W7005748020 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSocial anxietySocial inhibitionAnxietyMoodSocial stressSocial environmentShynessContext (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pre-drinking (drinking before going out) is prevalent among undergraduate students. Cognitive models of social anxiety and tension reduction theory propose that those high in social anxiety are at increased risk for pre-drinking to reduce anticipatory anxiety prior to social events. Pre-drinking occurs in various social contexts that differ in how anxiety-provoking they are for these individuals. Accordingly, those high in social anxiety may be at increased risk for pre-drinking to reduce anticipatory anxiety in specific contexts. The goal of this dissertation was to incorporate pre-drinking contexts and anticipatory anxiety into theoretically-based models of social anxiety and pre-drinking. In a daily diary study (Study 1), we tested the combined effect of in the moment social context and anxious mood on social anxiety-related pre-drinking. We hypothesized that elevated social anxiety would predict increased likelihood of pre-drinking and pre-drinking quantity when anxious mood was high in less familiar contexts. Partially supporting hypotheses, those high in social anxiety were more likely to be in less familiar contexts during pre-drinking when anxious mood was high, but did not pre-drink more heavily. Although not previously hypothesized, elevated social anxiety protected against pre-drinking when anxious mood was high in group contexts. In a laboratory experiment (Study 2), we examined the effect of social context on social anxiety-related increase in anticipatory anxiety and urge to drink prior to a social event. To provide the opportunity to pre-drink, participants completed a taste rating task in one of three social contexts and in an alcohol or no alcohol condition, following anticipatory anxious mood manipulation of an upcoming social interaction. We hypothesized that, compared to the no alcohol condition, those high in social anxiety would report increased anticipatory anxiety and urge to pre-drink when alone or with a stranger. Results indicated that those high in social anxiety reported increased anticipatory anxiety prior to the social interaction. Participants reported increased urge to pre-drink when alone and when with a stranger. Exploratory analyses suggested that social context may moderate social anxiety related increase in anticipatory anxiety and urge to pre-drink. The findings shed light on risk factors that could be targeted in clinical interventions aimed at reducing social anxiety-motivated problem drinking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)→Same topicAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes→French-language works237,207→