MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005806209

Season 15 Episode 08 - Warrior Societies

2007· other· en· W7005806209 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueConnecting Canadians: Canada’s Multicultural Newspapers Beta Website (Athabasca University) · 2007
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMohawkMilitantState (computer science)Front (military)Ridge
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a stereotypical image of the Warrior within First Nations culture: a militant carrying a gun, a\ncamouflaged fighter atop a blockade, a protester blocking a road. Unfortunately, these popular portrayals\nfail to look at the traditional and spiritual roles of Warriors and who they really are. Behind these militant\nimages, there is another story, traditional and spiritual in nature, and for the people. Within Warrior\nSocieties, all people have roles; men, women, elders and children are equal. And, without the involvement\nof all these people, Warrior societies would cease to exist.\nThis documentary will take an in-depth look at this issue by first examining the Wounded Knee standoff on\nthe Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota between the American Indian Movement and the United\nStates Army, the FBI and the State Militia. By examining what the Aboriginal communities at that time were\nstanding for, we will uncover what they were trying to accomplish. Twenty years later in Canada, on the Oka\nFirst Nation, a stand off took place between the Mohawk Warrior Society and the Canadian Army along with\nthe Quebec Police. This documentary will also look back at what triggered the standoff and what has been\nresolved since. Through their experiences, this documentary will examine the risks these Warriors take and\nthe spiritual essence of what they were trying to accomplish.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConnecting Canadians: Canada’s Multicultural Newspapers Beta Website (Athabasca University)French-language works237,207