Sea surface circulation in the straits of Malacca and the andaman sea using twenty-three years satellite altimetry data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ocean circulation in the Straits of Malacca is derived using the satellite altimeter data from January 1993 until 2015. The satellite altimeters are TOPEX, Jason-1, Jason-2, ERS-1, ERS-2, Envisat, SARAL, and Cryosat. The sea surface height derived from the satellite altimeter has been very useful in the study of the ocean circulation but still is not appropriate for the oceanographic application. This is because it is a superposition of geophysical effect such as the tidal effect. The tidal models are more suitable to be used in the open sea like the South China Sea. The tidal effect is rather complex to be determined, especially in a shallow water area like the area in the Strait of Malacca. In order to remove the tidal effect, the best ocean tide model needs to be examined to determine the ocean circulation in the Straits of Malacca. To verify the result, the sea level anomaly (SLA) data were compared to the tide gauge data and the pattern obtained are regularly the same. In order to check the ocean circulation using the altimetric data, the result was compared with the trajectories drifter from Marine Environmental Data Station (MEDS) of Canada. The trajectories of the drifter have confirmed that the current pattern around studied region during June 9, 1999 until July 9, 1999.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".