A Scarab Gem from the Etruscan Artisans' Quarter and Sacred Area at Cetamura del Chianti
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A scArAb gem mAde of corneliAn, carved in intaglio in the a globolo style generally designated as "Etrusco-Italic" (figs.1-3), was discovered in 1993 in Structure H at Cetamura del Chianti (maps, figs.4-7). 1 The gem has been published before 2 but recent discoveries on the site of Cetamura and a new publication on Etruscan scarab gems 3 provide the opportunity for some significant new observations on the context of the object and a more searching inquiry into questions of typology, subject matter, craftsmanship and condition.The stone was found in an area on the north side of Zone II of Cetamura, which has been conclusively identified in the past as an artisans' quarter.But the object must be studied now in light of a major new insight in the interpretation of the site of Cetamura.An Etruscan sanctuary, Building L, has been discovered adjacent to the artisans' quarter on the south and west of Zone II (maps, figs.5-7; identification made in 2006-2007).Much more will be related regarding the sanctuary, but it is best to begin with a fuller description of the artisans' quarter (map, fig.7).One of the major finds is a kiln, Structure K, for making brick, tile, and loom weights, dated to the first phase of activity on Zone II (300-150 BCE; fig.8). 4 A second, smaller feature, Structure J, is hypothesized to be a kiln as well, probably for making pottery, built up against the 1.The excavations at Cetamura del Chianti, an Etruscan hilltop habitation located ca. 30 km northeast of Siena, take place with the support and supervision of the Soprintendenza per i Beni Archeologici della Toscana, Florence, under Fulvia Lo Schiavo, Superintendant, and Silvia Gogglioli, Functionary for Cetamura.Basic documentation of the site: Cetamura Antica, 2000.See also the website: http://www
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".