Spectacular Evidence: Theatres of the Observed Mind \nDr Michelle Williams Gamaker lecture: \nLygia Clark, The House is a Body - Biological Architecture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Convened by Dr Zoë Mendelson and presented by Camberwell, Chelsea, Wimbledon Graduate School Public Programme. \n \nA one-day symposium, Spectacular Evidence, will include presentations, performances, screenings and talks from the fields of visual art, medicine and critical theory. Drawing upon histories of madness and its exhibition, and considering how it has been staged as cultural performance, this event will consider behaviours and ‘performances’ exchanged between viewer and physician in relation to patient. \n \nContinuing on from my PhD research into Brazilian artist Lygia Clark, I discuss Clark's work on 'biological architecture' \nProgramme: \nDr Zoë Mendelson: Short introduction \n \nSession 1: Madness and aesthetic spectacle \n \nZoe Beloff \n \nDr Anna Harpin \n \nFlorence Peake \n \n1pm – 2pm – lunch break \n \nSession 2: Case studies/Studies of cases \n \n2pm – 4pm – afternoon session \n \nDr Michelle Williams Gamaker \n \nEddy Dreadnought \n \nSal Anderson \n \nDr Caterina Albano \n \n20 min coffee break \n4pm – 6pm – evening session \n \nSession 3: Madness, space and object \n \nDr Zoë Mendelson \n \nDr Monika Ankele \n \nDr Joanne Morra \n \nRosemary Cronin
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".