Stochastic short-term production scheduling accounting for fleet allocation, operational considerations, blending restrictions and future multi-element ore control data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mine production scheduling may be long-term or short-term based on the time period considered and the final objective. The optimization goal of short-term production scheduling is to minimize the mining cost expected from a mine while satisfying operational constraints, such as mining slope, grade blending, metal production, mining capacity and processing capacity; however some parameters may be uncertain, such as metal quality and fleet parameters. Traditional short-term production planning is carried out by two sequential optimizations, production schedule is defined at the first step and the available fleet is evaluated for this schedule as a second step, however; the fleet availability, hauling time and mining considerations do not influence the schedule decision. In addition, the fleet optimization algorithms do not consider uncertainty in their parameters and do not take into account the local mineralization of the deposit because a single possibly misleading total aggregated block tonnage is linked to each sector to be mined. The local mineralization or local scale variability between blocks assists in the blending process and metal quality control; however, the traditional short-term production scheduling is based on exploration drilling or a sparse data ore body model, while in practice grade control data or close spacing blasthole drilling classify the material as ore and waste because their short-scale information is not available at the time of the monthly short-term planning. The local variability is relevant in the short-term production scheduling to define the destination of the material.The short-term mine production scheduling in this thesis is developed as a single formulation where mining considerations, production constraints, uncertainty in the orebody metal quantity, as well as fleet parameters, are evaluated together to define a well informed sequence of mining that results in high performance at the mine operation. The formulation is implemented at a multi-element iron mine and the resulting monthly schedules show lower cost, minable patterns and, efficient fleet allocation, that ensures a higher and less variable utilization of the fleet over the conventional schedule approach.Uninformed and ultimately costly decisions can be taken because of imperfect geological knowledge or information effect. The orebody uncertainty may be updated by simulated future ore control data to account for local scale grade variability, and the information used to discriminate ore and waste in practice. Multi-element orebody uncertainty models are updated based on the correlation of exploration data and past ore control data, this orebody uncertainty is then used to optimize the short-term production scheduling that leads to better performance in terms of matching ore quality targets and delivering recoverable reserves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".