MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7006146155

Side-viewing high-speed video observations of ice crushing

2004· article· en· W7006146155 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpallPenetration (warfare)Fracture (geology)Penetration rateEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionVolumetric flow rate
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rectangular thick sections (1 cm thickness) of lab-grown mono-crystalline ice have been confined between two thick Lexan plates and crushed at -10°C from one edge face at a rate of 1 cm/s using a stainless steel platen (1 cm thickness) inserted between the plates. The transparent Lexan plates permitted side viewing of the ice behavior during crushing and the visual data were recorded using high-speed video. An in-plane fracture occurs in the ice sample early in the tests and expands from the platen/ice contact area as load increases. Ice on one side of the in-plane fracture experiences shattering ands pulverization while the ice on the other side remains intact but melts at the platen/ice contact where the pressure is high (~40 MPa). The continuous production and flow of liquid at high pressure in a thin layer at the intact ice/platen interface was strikingly evident and most of the load was supported in this zone. While some spalls did occur at the intact ice contact zone, cyclic spalling that normally occurs in the ice crushing experiments was suppresses due to the unusual confinement arrangement. The crushing on one side of the in-plane fracture and melting on the other side occurred continuously at the nominal platen penetration rate for most of a test, however, when spalls did occur the relative platen/ice penetration rate was momentarily higher due to the release of elastic energy in the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→