Tip 2 Diyabetli, Prediyabetik ve Sağlıklı Bireylerde Kardiyorespiratuar Uygunluk Parametrelerinin Karşılaştırılması
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes impairs cardiorespiratory fitness. Individuals with impaired glucose \ntolerance have an increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. There are no \nstudies comparing cardiorespiratory fitness parameters of type 2 diabetic, prediabetic and \nhealthy individuals in the literature. The purpose of this study was to compare \ncardiorespiratory fitness parameters of type 2 diabetic, prediabetic and healthy individuals. \nThirteen diabetic, thirteen prediabetic, thirteen healthy subjects with same age and gender \nwere enrolled in the study. Demographic, physical characteristics and laboratory findings of \nsubjects were recorded. Body composition (Bioelectrical impedance analysis-BIA), lung \nfunction (pulmonary function test-PFT), respiratory muscle strength (maximal inspiratory \nand expiratory pressure/MIP-MEP), functional capacities (6 Minute Walk Test/ 6MWT), \nmaximal exercise capacities (Incremental shuttle walk test/ISWT), cardiorespiratory fitness \n(Cardiopulmonary exercise test/CPET), physical activity levels (International Physical Activity \nQuestionnaire/IPAQ; accelerometer), quality of life (Short Form-36) and activities of daily \nliving (Canadian Activity Performance Measurement/COPM) were evaluated. Pulmonary \nfunctions, inflammatory levels, cardiorespiratory fitness levels, weekly physical activity \nlevels, quality of life, activities of daily living, maximal exercise capacity, body composition \nand functional capacity of three groups were different (p <0.05). Type 2 diabetic and \nprediabetic individuals have decreased oxygen consumption. Type 2 diabetic patients’ \noxygen consumption is significantly lower than healthy subjects. Respiratory muscle strength \nand IPAQ scores of three groups were similar (p> 0.05). We suggest that it will be important \nto assess cardiorespiratory fitness in individuals with impaired glucose metabolism. \nImproving cardiorespiratory fitness according to CPET results could prevent or delay diabetic \ncomplications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".