Terrestrial and Aquatic Invertebrate Assemblage Responses to Cattle Access Management in Wetland Riparian Areas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cattle grazing in riparian zones can significantly impact both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. This thesis investigates the effects of cattle activity on ground beetle assemblages in riparian areas and the colonization dynamics of macroinvertebrates in aquatic ecosystems in response to cattle manure. Cattle activity alters soil and vegetation to varying levels dependent on grazing pressure, affecting ground beetle abundance and community composition. Higher levels of cattle disturbance led to increased ground beetle abundance, particularly evident during vegetation rebound following cattle exclusion, while evenness decreased with escalating disturbance levels, illustrating the complex responses to alterations prompted by cattle activity. In aquatic ecosystems, cattle access to wetlands introduces traffic and manure excretion. Manure serves as a nutrient source for invertebrates, with colonization of manure dominated by non-biting midge larvae and freshwater shrimp. Residues from antiparasitic drugs such as eprinomectin, significantly affect decomposition processes; however, invertebrate abundance shows no response to these residues, with invertebrates accelerating manure decomposition and nutrient loss in both eprinomectin treated and untreated cattle manure. Understanding the ecological dynamics of cattle in riparian and wetland ecosystems is crucial for preserving ecosystems and informing Best Management Practices for cattle grazing. This research provides valuable insights into the impacts of livestock activities on both terrestrial and aquatic environments, contributing to the development of sustainable management strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".