When God Was a Keychain: Commercial Goods and Ainu Indigeneity in Hokkaido, Japan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation uses the case study of the Hokkaido Ainu and bear imagery to investigate the recursive relationship between non-Indigenous consumption of Indigeneity and Japanese national branding. I argue that, since the initial colonization of the northern Island now known as Hokkaido, non-Ainu populations have consumed Ainu Indigeneity through appropriation and commercial dispersal of Ainu material objects. Objects consumed run the gamut: academics have taken skeletons from Ainu graves to produce scholastic knowledge; Ainu gender identities have been consumed and used for non-Ainu amusement; Ainu music and performance has served as entertainment for non-Ainu. Within these examples, however, there is perhaps no example more powerful or tangible than the appropriation and commercialization of the “Ainu bear.” \nThroughout interactions between Ainu and non-Ainu, the Ainu bear has served as a focal point of cultural consumption: consumption of the symbolism and material objects connected to the bear, by Japanese, European, and North American individuals, has resulted in a complex colonization of Ainu culture. The Ainu bear image, along with Ainu identity, has been appropriated by the larger Japanese nation state. In part, this image has served to help Hokkaido establish a specific regional identity. This regional identity presents Hokkaido as a far-flung wilderness that the Japanese nation state has successfully occupied and tamed. There exists, in this regional identity of Hokkaido, a duality: Hokkaido serves as both an exotic wilderness and a claimed territory. The Ainu bear, and the history connected to its appropriation, have been central to the cultivation of this image. The Japanese appropriation of bear imagery have allowed for the formation of a uniquely Hokkaido regional identity, that, importantly, ties into the larger national narrative of Japan itself.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".