MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006552833

Un programme de résidence d’artistes et son impact : le cas de la Résidence des Amériques du conseil des arts de Montréal.

2020· dissertation· fr· W7006552833 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEspaceINRS Institutional Digital Repository (Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInsects and Parasite Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)The artsHomogeneous
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Le présent essai fait état d’une expérience de stage et de recherche menée dans le cadre du programme de maîtrise en Mobilisation et transfert des connaissances (MOB). Le stage a été accueilli par la Fonderie Darling, organisme à but non lucratif dont le mandat est de soutenir et faire la diffusion de l’art contemporain. Le stage, encadré conjointement par les champs de la recherche et de la pratique, s’inscrit dans le dixième anniversaire de la Résidence des Amériques du Conseil des Arts de Montréal, programme de résidence d’artistes co-administré par la Fonderie Darling et le Conseil des Arts de Montréal. Ses objectifs concernent la réflexion sur les processus, les relations et les pratiques enracinées au cœur de la résidence. Nous nous sommes intéressées notamment aux relations Nord-Sud entourant ce programme et au rapport avec la diaspora latino-américaine. Toutefois, l’attention s’est concentrée principalement sur la question de ce que produit une résidence, ainsi que sur la façon dont elle est évaluée. Ce mandat de stage a conduit à la conception de deux produits de recherche — un rapport de consultation et une fiche synthèse des résultats de recherche — et de deux activités de transfert de connaissances — un webinaire à trois dans le milieu académique et une rencontre numérique avec divers intervenants de la pratique — qui permettent de vérifier la place de la recherche dans le domaine de la pratique, ainsi que la pertinence de la mobilisation des connaissances au cœur du milieu de l’art contemporain. Enfin, ce travail questionne le rôle essentiel de l’agent d’interface lors du passage de la recherche à l’action, ainsi que les particularités de ce processus au sein d’un organisme éloigné des pratiques de recherche. </p><p> This essay reports the results of an internship and research experience completed as part of an MA program Mobilisation et transfert des connaissances (MOB). The internship was hosted by the Darling Foundry, a non-profit organization whose mandate is to support and disseminate contemporary art. The internship, doubly framed by theoretical and field research, is situated in the context of the tenth anniversary of the Résidence des Amériques du Conseil des Arts de Montréal, artist residency program co-administered by the Darling Foundry and the Conseil des Arts de Montréal. Its objectives concern reflection on the processes, relationships, and practices rooted in the core of the art residency. We were particularly interested in the North-South relations surrounding this program, and in the relationship with the Latin American diaspora in Montreal. However, attention has been paid to the results of this artist residency program, as well as to how it was evaluated. The internship mandate is accomplished in the creation of two research products - a consultation report and a summary sheet of research results - and two knowledge transfer activities - a three way webinar between students in the academic world and a digital meeting with various actors involved in the practice milieu - that allow us to verify the place of research in the field of practice, as well as the relevance of knowledge mobilization at the heart of the contemporary art milieu. Finally, this work refers to the essential role of the interface agent during the transition from research to action, and the specifics of this process within an organization aloof from research practices.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspaceINRS Institutional Digital Repository (Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique)Same topicInsects and Parasite InteractionsFrench-language works237,207