MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006572701

Unveiling hidden mergers: quantifying merger prevalence in post-starburst galaxies and the efficacy of common merger identification techniques

2023· dissertation· en· W7006572701 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalaxyGalaxy mergerIdentification (biology)Sample (material)SkyConvolutional neural network
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerical simulations and observations agree that galaxies tend to evolve from star-forming spiral galaxies to quiescent ellipticals. Post-starburst (PSB) galaxies, defined as having experienced a recent burst of star formation, followed by a prompt truncation in further activity, are thought to be observed whilst rapidly transitioning from star-forming to quiescence. Thus, identifying the mechanism(s) causing a galaxy to experience a post-starburst phase provides integral insight into the causes of rapid quenching. Galaxy mergers have long been proposed as a possible post-starburst trigger. Effectively testing this hypothesis requires a large spectroscopic galaxy survey to identify the rare PSBs as well as high quality imaging and robust morphology metrics to identify mergers. In this work, I bring together these critical elements by selecting PSBs from the overlap of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the Canada-France Imaging Survey and applying a suite of classification methods including non-parametric morphology metrics such as asymmetry and Gini-M20, a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained to identify post-merger galaxies, and visual classification. This work therefore includes the largest and most comprehensive assessment of the merger fraction of PSBs to date. I find that the merger fraction of PSBs ranges from 19% to 42% depending on the merger identification method and details of the PSB sample selection. These merger fractions represent an excess of 3-46x relative to non-PSB control samples. My results demonstrate that mergers play a significant role in generating PSBs, but that other mechanisms are also required. \n \nCritical to the interpretation of the observed merger fraction of PSBs in this work is quantifying the efficacy of the merger identification methods employed. To test this, 2,119 known recent mergers (< 200 Myr) are drawn from the IllustrisTNG100 cosmological simulation, where assembly history and properties of the merger are known with certainty and devoid of observational impairment. Synthetic r-band images of the mergers are generated directly from the simulation particle data and degraded to various image qualities, adding observational effects such as sky noise and atmospheric blurring. The efficacy of the non-parametric merger identification methods is quantified using the completeness of recovered mergers, which is shown to increase from as low as 1% to as high as 37% as sky noise and atmospheric blurring decrease, but also depends on the morphology statistic considered. However, even in idealized imaging, free from atmospheric blurring and with minimal sky noise, the maximum completeness achieved is 39% indicating that reliable merger detection may be limited by the viewing angle at which it is observed. Future work will assess if CNN and visual inspection methods can identify mergers more reliably and thus allow for a more accurate quantification of the number of mergers in post-starburst galaxies and other galaxy samples, moving forward.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)Same topicCell Image Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207