A visão: cruzamentos formais e narrativos no cinema real
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Documentary and animation are not antagonistic concepts, referring to two distinct forms of narrative and formal expression. On the contrary, there is an interchangeable relationship between the two, and animation often works towards “representing the unrepresentable”, materializing the author's vision in a way that profilmic image would have difficulty achieving. This work consists of a proposal for a hybrid documentary about Visão magazine, a comic book publication appearing in Portugal during the PREC period, whose libertarian and transgressive attitude contrasted with the repression felt in the country during the time of the Estado Novo dictatorship and the Colonial War. The structure of the film will be based on a dialectic between filmed image and animation, forcing us to rethink concepts such as “documentary truth” and “factuality”, in light of the way in which films such as Waltz with Bashir and Persepolis have problematized our relationship with the genre. This thesis begins by questioning the very nature of documentary cinema - and particularly animated documentary – through concepts by Bill Nichols and Annabelle Honess Roe. Its goal is to list the various existing modes of representation and, in particular, to demonstrate how a performative documentary can make use of the evocative potential of animation to achieve an engaging story. Taking from the premise that non-fiction cinema allows to transcend the mere reproduction of facts, anchoring itself in authorial memory and subjectivity to produce a new kind of knowledge, this thesis will demonstrate, through contemporary examples, how the director’s experience and his affective relationship with the theme can influence the edification of the film, leading to a kind of “truth” that relates more strongly to his internal universe, than with a confrontation with the historical world. Having drawn the theoretical support base for the project, we’ll approach its conceptualization, describing each technical area and its inherent implications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".