MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006604205

UNGULATES SEARCH FOR THE IDEAL HOME: HOW PREDATION AND FORAGE DIFFERENTIALLY AFFECT MALES AND FEMALES IN A PARTIALLY MIGRATORY POPULATION

2021· dissertation· en· W7006604205 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Mathematics Enthusiast · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of AlbertaParks CanadaRocky Mountain Elk FoundationUniversity of MontanaMontana State UniversityAlberta Environment and ParksSafari Club International FoundationNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationAlberta Conservation AssociationMassachusetts Department of Fish and GameIdaho Department of Fish and GameNational Science Foundation
KeywordsForagePredationContext (archaeology)BovidaePopulationPredatorAffect (linguistics)Reproductive successIdeal free distribution
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Migration is a strategy used across taxa to access resources in temporally heterogenous landscapes. Migratory species can attain higher abundances because access to higher quality resources, and/or reduction in predation risk. However, most migratory species occur in partially migratory populations, a mix of migratory and non-migratory, resident individuals. I first investigate the potential mechanisms maintaining partial migration in a partially migratory elk (Cervus canadensis) population. I test whether the theory of Ideal Free Distribution (IFD) can explain the coexistence of different migratory tactics in a partially migratory population. IFD predicts that individuals exhibit density-dependent vital rates and should select different migratory tactics to maximize individual fitness, resulting in equal fitness () between tactics. We found density dependent pregnancy and adult female survival for residents, providing a fitness incentive to switch tactics. Despite differences in vital rates between tactics, mean λ (fitness) was equal, as predicted by IFD, because individual females switched tactics toward those of higher fitness. Next, I tested the Reproductive Strategy Hypothesis (RSH) for sexual segregation in the context of partial migration. I compared males and females for differences in their use and selection for forage and predation risk across spatiotemporal scales. I found support for the RSH as males adopted the migratory tactic with the highest forage quality and used higher quality forage than females. In summer, females avoided the primary predator of neonate calves further supporting the RSH, but potentially at the expense of increased exposure to wolf predation risk. Antler growth and development was driven by age and forage quality, and because migration increased forage quality, migration likely benefits male reproductive success, also supporting the RSH. Finally, I investigated the effect of age, forage, predation and harvest on male elk survival. Male elk survival was largely a function of age, as human harvest was the primary cause of mortality and antler-point-restrictions resulted in low survival for male elk over 4 years of age (S=0.42). My work demonstrates ecological drivers of population dynamics of partially migratory ungulates that has global relevance given recent declines in migratory large ungulate populations and migratory routes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Mathematics EnthusiastSame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207