MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7006613658

Using the global to support the local : community development at Poplar River and the establishment of a UNESCO World Heritage Site in northern Manitoba

2009· dissertation· en· W7006613658 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommunity developmentResource (disambiguation)Sustainable developmentScale (ratio)Sustainable communityWorld heritagePoliticsTRIPS architecture
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The community of Poplar River in Nofhern Manitoba is using a IINESO World Heritage Site designation to assist with meeting iocal needs.Going beyond the expected, non-renewable resource development and poverty cycle, Asatisiwipe First Nation is taking control over its own developmental plans, and forging an ecologically sustainable vision of community-controlled economic and political development.This planning initiative is taking place before specific large scale development proposals, in effect, a preemptive strike against the non renewable resource development sector.This thesis explores issues surrounding the use of grand scale institutions for local purposes and researches the meaning of "development" of a remote Aboriginal community.Consisting of trips to the community to collect interviews and a thorough policy analysis, it can be concluded that despite Eurocentric planning/definitions, boundary construction, and Parks Canada/TINESCO interference, this is still the best solution for the community as it is an initiative that has been instigated by the First Nation itself.Azaadtiwiziibi giiwedinong Manitoba odaabajitoonaawaa' iwe I-INESCO World Heritage site gaa-ijrjgaadeg ji-wiiji'iwewaad gechiwaag.Awashime ji-izhichigeng ji-giitwaami- aabajichigaadegin ondaadiziwin zhigwa gaa-gidimaagizing.Asatiwisipi Ishkonigan wiinawaa odazhäkaanaawaa' ji-ondaadizing imaa nakeya'ii.Zhigwa miinawaa ji-anokaadamowaad jiondaadiziwaad ani-niigaan zhigwa ogimaawin ji-niigaanishkamowaad.Owe onashowewin da- maadanokaajigaade anokiiwinan ji-onachigaadeg gechiwaag onji.Glizhaach ji-gwayaanchigeng gechiwaag imaa onachigaadeg ji-ani-wiiji'igowaad bemaadiziwaad.Owe mazina'igan wiindamaagemagan aaniin waa-izhi-onachigaadegin ono onashowewinan ji-wiiji'igowaad gechiwaag imaa gaa-ayaawaad giiwedinong ishkoniganan.Ji-izhaang ji-gaganoonindwaa Anishinaabeg ji-maamiinobii'igaadegin onashowewinan mazina'iganing.Daa-ikidom aaniish wemitigoozhiwi-izhichigewin, gechiwaag imaa gaa-onokaajigaadeg zhigwa gaye Parks Canada/LINESCO gaa-wiidookaagewaad, mii owe maawanj menoseg wiinawaa aaniish Ani shinaab e g o dazhiik aanaaw aa' owe izhichi gewin.La communauté autochtone de Poplar River dans le Nord du Manitoba utilise le site du patrimoine mondial de I'UNESCO pour a.ppuyer les besoins locaux.La Première natÌon d'asatisiwipe aki devient gérante du développement écologique dans la forêt boréale où elle habite.Elle est responsable de l'économie et de la politique communautaire.Cette initiative a eu lieu avant les propositions du d,éveloppement à grande échelle des ressources non renouvelables dans la région.Cette thèse explore la signification du terme ainsi que l'emploi des institutions internationales par une communa.utéautochtones isolée.Basé sur des entrevues et d'une analyse politique approþndie, nous pouvons conclure que, malgré les notions eurocentriques, malgré l'établ¡.ssementdes frontières et les désaccords avec Parcs Canada et I'UNESCO, nous croyons que ce projet est encore la meilleure solution pour cette communauté car il s'agit d'une initiative qui a été mise en place par la Première nation.ACKNO\ryLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank first and foremost my supervisor, Dr. Peter Kulchyski, who has supported and encouraged me throughout the entire process of this thesis.I am grateful for the knowledge, the experience and the sense of positivity that he has shared with me about my project.Working with him has been so wonderful and mind-boggling as he is so well-informed.I would also like to thank Dr. Renate Eigenbrod and Dr. Stephane Mclachlan, my two committee members, for providing me with assistance; their knowledge greatly helpful in reconceptualizing certain fmis]understandings.Thank you to all the professors in the Native Studies Department at the University of Manitoba, especially Dr. Christ Trott and Dr. Emma LaRocque, who helped me open my eyes to a lot of things and who impacted the way I look

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→