Update from the International Working Group for mapping and coding of nomenclatures for Paeditric and Congenital Heart Disease.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL SUMMIT ON Nomenclature for Congenital Heart Disease was held on 27 May, 2001, in Toronto, Canada, just prior to the 3rd World Congress of Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery. At the Summit, enthusiastic and virtually unanimous support was expressed for the development of a unified system for describing congenital cardiac malformations, as well as the related procedures used to palliate or correct them. At the meeting of the International Nomenclature Committee for Paediatric and Congenital Heart Disease that immediately followed the Summit, a working group was appointed and given the following tasks:\n\n * Finalise the crossmap of the nomenclature “Short Lists” of the European Paediatric Cardiac Code1 and the International Congenital Heart Surgery Nomenclature and Database Project,2 both published in 2000.\n * Crossmap the “Long Lists” and develop a single “super-tree” of nomenclature, to be called the International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code, by the time of the next World Congress in Buenos Aires, Argentina.\n * Report back to the International Committee to diffuse information about progress.\n\nMid-way through the time allotted to complete these tasks, therefore, we present a brief update on the progress of the working group to date. For additional details, we refer the reader to a full report outlining the background and events leading to the founding of the International Nomenclature Project for Paediatric and Congenital Heart Disease (Fig. 1), published in Cardiology in the Young in 2002.3
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.043 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.018 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.034 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".