MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006653448

The Value of Looking Back: Using History in Environmental Studies

2011· other· en· W7006653448 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Analysis and Corporate Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValue (mathematics)Environmental historySustainabilityAppropriationCraftOrder (exchange)Action (physics)SpeculationHistory of science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"The Value of Looking Back: Using History in Environmental Studies," ESAC 2011 Annual Conference. Bio : • Bill Parenteau (Chair) (History, University of New Brunswick) • Claire Campbell (History and College of Sustainability, Dalhousie University) • Joshua MacFadyen (History, University of Western Ontario) • Mark McLaughlin (History, University of New Brunswick) Abstract : The Brundtland Commission may have given us a working definition of sustainability, but as Wynn wryly suggested, the issues embedded in sustainability have much deeper roots. Yet in public discussion the “environment” is usually headlined only in the present or future tenses: in a language of crisis and immediacy, or a speculation about proposed alternatives. Historians and historical geographers, however, believe it essential to consider the “thousand previous investments and accidents of history” that have shaped the places and practices that we have inherited, in order to craft thoughtful and effective responses. Environmental history helps us understand the depth and complexity of human impact on the natural world, by placing specific sites and issues in a longer tradition of appropriation and use. It also sheds light on human motivation and action by situating older practices in their ideological, political, and cultural contexts. But at the same time, we can find earlier examples of resilience, adaptation, and engagement with the natural world that might serve as inspiration for new kinds of sustainable practice. Equally important, an historical study encourages – indeed requires – drawing upon evidence from across the humanities and sciences. Our roundtable, all members of NiCHE [Network of Canadian History and Environment], will discuss our experiences in connecting the environmental history of Atlantic Canada to teaching, research, and policy. Josh will discuss the application of GIS in assessing Prince Edward Island’s rural landscapes; Mark and Bill, the implications of New Brunswick’s history of industrial forestry for sustainable public forest management; and Claire, the challenges of teaching Atlantic history in an interdisciplinary program of environment and sustainability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)Same topicFinancial Analysis and Corporate GovernanceFrench-language works237,207